Phillips sees Essex through

Essex 157 for 8 (Pettini 42, ten Doeschate 34, Phillips 33*) beat Middlesex 153 for 5 (Morgan 69) by two wickets
Scorecard

In his programme notes, Ryan ten Doeschate, the Essex captain, wrote about the need for his side to rediscover the type of form that has encouraged their Chelmsford ground to be regarded as a fortress. Tim Phillips must have been at least one avoid reader.

Just as when it seemed lowly Middlesex had done enough to derail the Eagles' charge and come away from the ground with the points, it was Phillips who staged a late assault to extend his side's winning run to four games and keep them sitting pretty in South Group.

After striding to the crease, with the home side 113 for 6 and on the brink of defeat, Phillips spanked four sixes to change the dynamic of an innings that Middlesex had controlled from the outset. With 13 to win off the final over, bowled by Gurjit Sandhu, Phillips launched one six into the boisterous Chelmsford crowd over midwicket before finishing the job with a top-edge that sailed over the rope and sent the crowd into delirium.

Middlesex, who had fought so admirably and seemed as if they were going to make it two wins in three days, trudged off the field dejected. Not many sides come away from this ground on a Friday evening with the spoils and their efforts must be applauded. Yet their slim hopes of advancing to the knockout stages are now gone.

A couple of days ago, the Panthers had lost eight consecutive Twenty20 games and were a side so muddled, the ignominy of a winless campaign was not implausible. They can now firmly concentrate on re-establishing their Championship form. For Essex, their interest is firmly on the Natwest T20.

Should Essex manage to advance to the latter stages of this competition, they will look back on this result as one that could well shape their campaign. So parlous was their position that pockets of the 5,000 strong crowd had started heckling their own players. But all was forgotten when Phillips began depositing Middlesex's threadbare attack to all parts.

The all-rounder's innings was made even more remarkable by what had gone before. Only Eoin Morgan had managed to bat with any sort of fluency on his way to a pugnacious half-century and even then, runs had to be earned.

Morgan played with all the swagger expected from an England limited-overs specialist as he clubbed nine boundaries, including two lusty sixes, to thrust Middlesex to 153 for 5. It had seemed, for so long, that it was going to be enough but Essex had other ideas.

There were given scare though. On debut, 19-year-old Harry Podmore had Jesse Ryder caught in the deep and as others scratched around him, Pettini's innings lost the impetus he had built up during the powerplay. Their much revered batting line-up came and went without a whimper as the decibel levels decreased with every passing wicket.

Phillips, however, combined with ten Doeschate to keep the contest alive and as the equation became more achievable, Middlesex's demons resurfaced. The departure of ten Doeschate in the penultimate over, caught by a diving Morgan at cover, seemed to swing the balance back in Middlesex's favour. But that only gave Phillips the license to free his arms.

Middlesex remain over reliant on Morgan. Not only did he bind their innings together with a pugnacious half-century but his effervescence and leadership in the field sets the standards.

His departure, in the fifteenth over, run-out in avoidable circumstances coming back for an improbable second, saw Middlesex's innings direction. Neil Dexter and John Simpson were assiduous in approach rather than extravagant in the knowledge that there was little ammunition to follow with just one boundary registered in the final five overs.


Read More..

Hampshire hold off Howell onslaught

Hampshire 180 for 6 (Adams 69*) beat Gloucestershire 178 for 8 (Howell 50, Smith 3-26) by two runs
Scorecard

Jimmy Adams may have slipped a notch or two down the list of likely T20 match-winners, such is the strength, and depth, of Hampshire's batting department these days. And not too many would nominate Will Smith's darting off-breaks as a key weapon. Between them, though, these two kept one of this competition's top-rated teams on track for quarter-final qualification.

But, boy, was it tight in the end. Or, rather, old boy, wasn't it close. Benny Howell, who left Hampshire in 2011 in search of better opportunities, went agonisingly close to upsetting his former employers.

Gloucestershire, having been given a wonderful start by Alex Gidman and Michael Klinger, slipped away horribly in mid-innings once Smith had removed both openers in the space of three deliveries. And they seemed to have no chance at all - until Howell started swinging with stunning effect.

From nowhere, almost, the visitors wanted 28 runs off 12 balls - and they might have made it, too, but for a disciplined penultimate over from Chris Wood followed by Howell's last gasp run-out when seven were needed from two deliveries.

Gloucestershire's would-be hero trudged off with 50, from just 22 balls, to his name, and the game was finally up for the underdogs. But the roar that greeted Hampshire's victory had more than a tinge of relief about it.

It was all a bit of a lesson for the hosts, really. With so much batting firepower at their disposal they really should have made 200 after reaching 121 for 3 from 12 overs. But both James Vince and Glenn Maxwell, having looked a million dollars apiece while moving into the 30s, had gone by then - and it was left to Adams to make sure a defendable if not impregnable total was reached on a good pitch.

Although Adams continues to captain the side in longer forms of the game, he gave up the T20 leadership a couple of years ago. He remains a guiding light, however, and without ever appearing to be rushed he scored his unbeaten 69 at a good lick (off 46 balls) while lifting a couple of sixes on top of five fours.

Hampshire probably realised they had failed to slam the door in Gloucestershire's face. But if they were in any doubt then the way Gidman and Klinger raced to 61 would have shattered any illusions.

Usually, when the faster bowlers have been found waning it is left-arm spinner Danny Briggs who does the business. This time, though, the new father - his first son, Stanley, was born last weekend - was reasonably tight without being particularly penetrative. Enter Smith.

The former Durham player has been a handy bowler for his new county so far this campaign. Tonight he really came up trumps, removing both batsmen in quick succession and later returning to send back Chris Dent. That gave Smith competition best figures of 3 for 26 - and a place on Hampshire's centre stage alongside Adams.


Read More..

Wright overcomes tricky surface

Sussex 149 for 8 (Wright 85) beat Kent 114 (Piolet 3-14) by 35 runs
Scorecard

Sussex ended a run of five successive defeats in the South Group of the NatWest T20 Blast with a comfortable 35-run victory over Kent at Canterbury.

Luke Wright batted through the Sussex innings to make 85 from 61 deliveries in a total of 149 for 8 and Kent were never in the hunt, losing wickets regularly as they were bowled out for 114 in the penultimate over of their reply.

Batsmen on both sides found timing their shots tough on a painfully slow pitch so Wright's knock proved especially valuable. He passed 4,000 runs in T20 cricket when he reached seven and he went to his 25th T20 half-century with a six off left-arm seamer Adam Ball.

But even Wright was subdued by the surface, hitting just seven boundaries and another six, off Mitch Claydon, before he holed out to deep extra cover off the last ball of the innings.

Wright shared a stand of 71 for the second wicket with competition debutant Harry Finch (22) but Sussex's innings lost momentum when Rory Hamilton-Brown fell at the start of the 15th over as five wickets fell for 20 runs in 26 balls.

Bowlers who could take the pace off the ball prospered with James Tredwell taking 2 for 20 against the county he joined on loan to play Championship cricket for a month earlier this week.

The visitors needed early wickets to strengthen their position and they got a spectacular start when left-armer Lewis Hatchett, playing only his fourth T20 game, claimed his first wicket in the format by ripping out Kent skipper Rob Key's middle stump from an inside edge with the second ball of the game.

Sam Northeast fell in identical fashion in Hatchett's next over, then Hamilton-Brown pulled off a sensational one-handed catch to remove Alex Blake, diving full length to his right to brilliantly intercept a well-struck cut shot.

Sam Billings got Kent going with two straight-drive fours and when he and Daniel Bell-Drummond added 31 for the fourth wicket there was some hope for their side.

But medium-pacer Steffan Piolet and legspinner Will Beer strangled the life out of Kent's middle order, taking 5 for 39 between them in their combined eight overs.

Piolet picked up 3 for 14, including Kent's last hope Darren Stevens who gave the bowler a simple return catch, while Beer trapped top scorer Billings on the back leg for 23 as he took 2 for 25. He should have had a third wicket but Yasir Arafat inexplicably put down Adam Ball at extra cover when he offered the simplest of catches.

Ball gave Kent some respectability by helping number 11 David Griffiths add 27 runs - the second highest stand of the innings - for the last wicket before he lost his middle stump to Arafat.


Read More..

Dilshan signs for Surrey stint

Tillakaratne Dilshan, the Sri Lankan batsman, will play English domestic cricket for the first time after signing for Surrey as Hashim Amla's replacement.

Dilshan, who was part of the limited-overs leg of Sri Lanka's current tour, does not play Test cricket any more is likely to make his debut in the Championship match against Hampshire on June 28 and play in the NatWest T20 Blast match against Kent on July 2 before returning to Sri Lanka for the one-day series against South Africa. He will then return to Surrey until late August when Sri Lanka host an ODI series against Pakistan

"It's a fantastic opportunity for me to play for Surrey," Dilshan said. "They are one of the most historic clubs in the world and I very much hope to make a big impact whilst there. I've enjoyed playing at The Oval in the past and look forward to returning there with Surrey."

Alec Stewart, Surrey's director of cricket, said: "With the very crowded international fixture list, it's becoming increasingly difficult to sign a high class overseas cricketer to play in England.

"Therefore, we are very pleased to have been able to secure the services of a player of the calibre of Dilshan. There is a great deal of limited-overs cricket to be played in July and August and it is a big boost to be able to draw on someone with his huge experience and skills."

Surrey have needed to patch up their overseas position since Graeme Smith returned to South Africa for knee surgery.


Read More..

Pitch offered batsmen a good workout, says Raina

The pitch in Mirpur was something of a revelation for Suresh Raina, the India captain. The monsoons in Bangladesh had been delayed, but their impact led to the final match becoming the first rained out at Shere Bangla Stadium. Under overcast conditions and a deck that did not lack in moisture, lateral movement was almost perennially available and batsmen had to cope with some testing bounce as well.

"Especially in the subcontinent, I haven't seen a wicket do this much in the last 10 years," Raina said. "It was good for the team, for the batsmen to adapt to these conditions and take it to England and Australia for the Tests and the World Cup. Bangladesh are also going to West Indies. So I think it was a good battle between bat and ball and winning the series was important."

The average score in an ODI at Mirpur has been 240, but over the course of the last two ODIs, India had been bundled out for 105 and were on 119 for 9 when the rain ended things today. Bangladesh succumbed for 58 on Tuesday. There is room for an argument that both teams had been caught unawares by the amount of help that was on offer. Raina believed conditions like these made batsmen work harder and the bowlers were also allowed to come into their own.

"Whenever we play in India, Pakistan, Sri Lanka and Bangladesh, I think the batsmen always have the upper hand. Here, rain was coming in and bowlers had a new ball at both ends. So you had to control your shots and decide when to attack and when not to. Still I think, both sides played really well, especially India.

"Everyone stepped up to the plate. Most importantly all the bowlers had a fantastic tour. Especially Stuart Binny and Mohit Sharma . I think the two debutants, Parvez and Akshar also did really well. When you come to any tour, one thing that comes to your mind is that you need to win all the games. The series was tough, the wicket was doing something. Very happy with the boys, they did a fantastic job."

Four of the squad that visited Bangladesh - Cheteshwar Pujara, Ajinkya Rahane, Stuart Binny and Wriddhiman Saha - would also feature for the tour to England. The lessons learned from facing probing seam bowling in favourable conditions could help them.

"A lot of young players have come out of one and a half months of IPL. They were playing their first tour in Bangladesh when the wicket was doing something. We have learned how to tackle seaming conditions and a few players from our side are going to England so they could utilise these conditions to prepare for the Tests."

When asked how India could handle tougher conditions outside the subcontinent, Raina pointed out that long-format cricket would prompt a change in mindset and the pitches for those matches would be truer, which would help the batsmen. "That wicket is going to be more batting-friendly. Bounce will be there, but at the same time you can play your shots. Here I think the wicket was really doing a lot."


Read More..

Jesse Ryder joins Melbourne Renegades

New Zealand batsman Jesse Ryder will make his first appearance in the BBL this coming summer after signing with the Melbourne Renegades. Ryder has been granted leave from the Otago Volts to take part in Australia's domestic T20 competition and has joined a top order that also features Aaron Finch, Matthew Wade and Callum Ferguson.

"Respect and appreciation to Otago cricket for their flexibility," Ryder said from England, where he is currently playing county cricket with Essex. "I'm stoked and grateful to be taking part in one of the best T20 competitions in the world. The Renegades have some class players so I'm looking forward to contributing."

Ryder averages 27.40 at a strike-rate of 145.90 in T20 cricket but his on-field exploits have often been overshadowed by his behaviour off the field. Most recently, he was dropped from New Zealand's Test squad in February after he and team-mate Doug Bracewell stayed out late at a bar on the night before a Test match in which they could have played.

Subsequently, Ryder was also left out of the squad for the World T20 in Bangladesh, with New Zealand's selection chief Bruce Edgar declaring that he had to be excluded because "character is really important as part of our selection process". Ryder has not played for New Zealand since.

However, the fact that he is playing cricket at all is a positive after he was assaulted outside a Christchurch bar last March. The attack left Ryder in a critical condition in hospital, although he made a full recovery.

Later in 2013, he was given a retrospective six-month suspension for failing a routine drug test earlier in the year, while he was playing in the Ford Trophy. His list of off-field indiscretions stretches back to 2008.

However, the Renegades coach Simon Helmot said they had "a lot of faith" in Ryder, and that their director of cricket Tom Moody had been instrumental in recruiting him.

"He had no hesitation in nominating Jesse as a 'must have' for the Renegades and we're delighted to welcome him to the Renegades this summer," Helmot said. "We have a lot of faith in Jesse and I'm sure he'll quickly become a favourite with his big hitting in BBL 04."


Read More..

Yorkshire disappointed as pitch wins

Sussex 316 (Well 74, Lewis 61, Bresnan 3-81) and 228 for 3 (Wells 81, Hamilton-Brown 62, Nash 53) drew with Yorkshire 470 for 7 dec (Bairstow 161*, Leaning 99, Bresnan 68, Lyth 66, Magoffin 4-81)
Scorecard

"Come on lads, the crowd are booking in here already for next year."

"Wake up, wake up, it's a four."

It said much for the final day at Arundel that Jonny Bairstow's chirping, and desperate attempts to drag the game out of its slumber, will probably stay with the crowd longer than any of the actual cricket.

The spectators probably did not mind too much: they enjoyed a tranquil day at one of England's most picturesque grounds; and the early finish gave them a chance to get away in time for the football.

An inert pitch offered neither assistance for any bowlers nor incentive to entertain with strokeplay. The nub was a final day of earnest defensive strokes against batsmen masquerading as spin bowlers. It is hard to imagine many who attended wishing to see a Championship game played at a less idyllic ground anytime soon.

Yorkshire understandably opted to protect their quick bowlers from such a benign pitch, once it became clear that a fourth Championship victory of the season would be impossible. Eight bowlers were tried on the final day. The excitement, in so much as there was any, came from Andrew Gale giving Richard Pyrah three mid-ons: the 'Yorkshire wall'.

"It's been a poor pitch," Gale said. "It was so slow. Anything that happened out of the pitch happened slow enough to adapt as a batsman. If it turned a little bit you could adapt or if it seamed slightly you could adapt as well.

"With some of the fields Sussex set yesterday, it was very hard to kick the game on. It would have been nice to score quicker but it was very difficult with the slowness of the wicket and the fields that were being set.

"Sussex probably need to look at how they're going to create better entertainment here," Gale said. For most of this game, the cricket was of only incidental interest.

It was enough to reopen the old debate: why is the ECB so willing to reprimand counties for wickets that offer too much assistance for bowlers, but unwilling to do the same for excessively flat pitches? This was a particularly egregious example.

Yorkshire's haul of ten points takes them to 118, ahead of Nottinghamshire by virtue of having lost fewer games, though it should be pointed out that Yorkshire have played Northamptonshire twice already. Somerset, who lie five points back with a game in hand, still have two games against the bottom club to play.

Gale believes that Yorkshire have only played to 80% of their potential so far. England call-ups - including an unexpected one for Liam Plunkett - have not helped. The return of Ryan Sidebottom against Warwickshire on Sunday will be overdue but Tim Bresnan may miss the game; he has been carrying a sore elbow and may require an injection.

Yorkshire were also deprived of Adil Rashid for this game, who could also miss the trip to Birmingham as his wife is still expecting. That could mean that Azeem Rafiq keeps his place in the side.

"He got better as the game went on," Gale said. "The lad's had a rough time of it and been lacking a lot of confidence and he's shown a lot of character over the last month, coming back into Twenty20 and performing as he has done. He bowled okay."

Sussex's limited ambitions were understandable. They have not won in their last seven Championship matches, while they have also lost five consecutive T20 games. And then there are the revelations about match-fixing involving former players.

Sussex batsmen have scored eight hundreds this season, which sounds respectable enough, but four of those have come from Ed Joyce. That statistic did not change on the final day, but at least the top three each made half-centuries. Luke Wells hit 81 to go with his first innings 74; even with a draw a certainty, he showed no inclination to be aggressive. For any who fear that county cricket has no time for adhesive openers in the T20 age, it was a heartening sight.


Read More..

Poor form makes Cook sweat

At the ground where Kevin Pietersen once remarked that "it isn't easy being me" it has started to look a bit difficult to be Alastair Cook.

The England captain built his reputation on his ability to remain calm under pressure. He was the man to whom England threw the ball in the field when they were trying to make it reverse swing: so little did he sweat that they knew it would remain dry.

But, without a win in seven Tests, without a century in 11 Tests and 13 months and on the receiving end of some caustic words from high-profiles critics and Cook looked as if he was, metaphorically at least, starting to sweat in Leeds.

You can understand why Cook would be frustrated. Less than a year ago, he concluded his first year as Test captain with an Ashes win to follow a Test series victory away in India. His century against New Zealand was his 25th in Tests, which meant that, at the age of 28, he had scored more than any other England player. Much of that success seems to have been forgotten.

And you can, to some extent, understand why he feels that some in the media have an agenda. A year ago he led England to victory at this very ground in three days of cricket only to receive criticism for tactics dismissed as "negative". When victory and a century is not enough, a captain can be forgiven for wondering what more they have to do.

The catalyst for Cook's outburst - and in the context of the placid Cook, his comments about Shane Warne do constitute an outburst - might have been the relentless criticism he is attracting from the likes of Warne and Piers Morgan - who has taken to referring to Cook as "captain weasel" - but the longer-term damage has been caused by an erosion of Cook's position of authority by his modest form with the bat.

It matters not that this new-look England team are loyal to Cook. He will feel, naturally, that he is not fully pulling his weight while he is not contributing as he would like with the bat. And, having taken a very big decision over the future of Pietersen, Cook could have done with backing it up by reasserting his own worth as a player.

In the 11 Tests since the start of last summer's Ashes series, Cook is averaging just 25.81. He has passed 50 six times in 22 innings - which is just about okay - but he has not passed 72. By Cook's standards, it is a poor run. It is not, though, the worst run of form he has endured. As he put it, in 2010 he "didn't know where my next run was coming from."

 
 
"At the moment we do think this is the best side ... It is a cause for concern and something we need to address as quickly as we can" Alastair Cook on England's spinner issue
 

"This is slightly different because then I was getting score of one, seven, two," he said. "I really didn't know where my next run was coming from.

"I saw a stat on my batting. It said that in my first 10 or 12 games as captain, I scored seven hundreds [it was actually seven in his first 11 Tests as captain] and in the next 12 games or so I'd scored seven 50s and no hundreds [actually 11 Tests with six 50s].

"So the difference is that I haven't been converting those scores. That's more the frustration to be honest. But it just makes me doubly determined to lead from the front and try to get a score."

Cook's long-term record suggests a return to form should be imminent. He is, after all, only 29 and there is no reason to think the powers are waning.

But it does seem fair to wonder whether the burden he has placed upon himself by taking the Pietersen decision - a decision for which some will never forgive him - has become too cumbersome for a man with a young family and almost a decade's international cricket behind him. The somewhat irritable manner in which he reacted to gentle media questioning on Thursday suggested a man who was tiring with some aspects of the role with which he is confronted.

Fading confidence has, no doubt, been a major factor in Cook's struggles. Just as it must have been for Moeen Ali, in his debut Test, to hear some of the nonsense spoken about his bowling.

A lack of confidence was the main reason Moeen Ali did not unveil his doosra at Lord's. And it is a situation that will not have been improved by England's lukewarm words of appreciation about him as a bowler in the days since. Having heard the coach, Peter Moores, describe the spin position as "a weakness" after the Lord's Test, Moeen on Thursday heard his captain describe the lack of spin options as "a cause for concern" It can hardly have inspired him with confidence.

"We know we need a good frontline spinner to balance the attack," Cook said. "You don't become a really good side without one.

"At the moment we do think this is the best side, so you might carry on seeing this side play until it feels that someone is ready to play. It is a cause for concern and something we need to address as quickly as we can."

Moeen is not a part-time spinner. While it is true that he has bowled relatively little this season - Worcestershire have signed Saeed Ajmal as an overseas player and Moeen has, at times, been absent with England squads - since the start of 2012 he has claimed 91 first-class wickets at a cost of 32.18 apiece. For a man who is still developing his skills and who plays on a New Road pitch offering him little, that is a record worthy of more respect than it is receiving. It is worth remembering, too, that when Graeme Swann took a five-wicket haul against Australia at Lord's last year, he became the first English spinner to do so in an Ashes Test at the venue since Hedley Verity in 1934.

Judging Moeen's bowling on one Test on a placid pitch might well prove to be as unwise as writing off Cook's abilities as a batsman after a modest few months.


Read More..

ICC defends move to cancel Americas Women's Championship

The ICC has defended itself from criticism it has received regarding the cancellation of the ICC Americas Women's Championship by stating that money that would have been spent to hold the event would be better used to fund grassroots initiatives.

The ICC Americas Women's Division One Championship was last held in 2012 with the winner, Canada, advancing to the 2013 Women's World T20 Qualifier in Ireland, where they defeated Japan to finish third out of four teams in their group. In the 2011 Women's World Cup Qualifier, USA participated as the Americas representative and suffered five heavy defeats in their six games but managed to record a landmark one-run win over Full Member nation Zimbabwe. The results were not enough to prevent the regional event being scrapped for the foreseeable future.

The championship's format (T20 or one-dayers) is defined by the closest global women's tournament, so that it can serve as a qualifying tournament for teams from the Americas. So, it's scrapping means there is no chance for a team from the Americas to compete for a spot in the 2016 Women's World T20 and potentially the 2017 Women's World Cup and 2018 Women's World T20 as well, as there is no regional qualifier.

"No region has had a women's championship cancelled," stated an ICC spokesperson in response to an email from ESPNcricinfo. "However, the Americas region is the first region in which a women's championship has not been scheduled.

"In recent times, the majority of ICC investment in the women's game at Associate and Affiliate member level has gone into running international competitions. In some regions, these competitions are run for small groups of domestic players.

"In some cases, this opportunity has led to a significant increase in the number of women's players in the region while in others this investment focus has stagnated already small local player numbers. The latter has happened in the Americas region."

Nadia Gruny, who played for the USA at the 2011 Women's World Cup Qualifier in Bangladesh and was their leading scorer at the 2012 ICC Americas Women's Championship, wrote a piece which was published by the Huffington Post last week in which she criticised the ICC's decision. Gruny believes it makes women's players in the USA and the Americas "victims of gender inequity" and that it is a violation of the "ICC's own principles and its goal to build a bigger, better, global game".

"Without the tournament, there is no incentive for US organisations to invest in women's cricket," Gruny wrote. "An entire region is denied an opportunity to play in a World Cup Qualifier event and the future generation of players has nothing to aspire to achieve. While other development regions improve as they conduct their qualifiers, the US and the rest of the Americas are left behind."

Durriya Shabbir, a Canada women's player, also spoke out against the move on the Associate and Affiliate Cricket Podcast. "Women's cricket has always been an afterthought," she said. "We've never been given the support from our board that we need to grow this game. Our boards are not doing enough to promote the game. If the ICC walks away from it as well, then what do the women have to look forward to?"

An online petition has been started to get the decision overturned and reinstate the ICC Americas Women's Championship. As of Tuesday, the petition had 248 signatures. Below ICC level though, the USA Cricket Association has not organised a regional or national championship tournament since July 2011 while there is also scant evidence of regional or national events for women's cricket elsewhere in the Americas. Meanwhile, the ICC wants to see evidence of domestic interest and growth across the region before they'll consider restarting the tournament.

Since the ICC Americas Women's Championship was first held in 2007, the ICC claims there have only been 90 new female players at amateur level that have been registered by a combination of the countries in the ICC Americas Women's Division One - USA, Canada, Bermuda, Cayman Islands, Argentina and Brazil. These 90 new players were from levels that were low to begin. The USA, a country with more than 300 million people, is estimated to have only 100 registered female players, a number which is made up mainly of expatriates from South Asia and the Caribbean.

The ICC says the member countries in the region were informed during 2013 that the investment money that had previously been spent on running the tournament would be made available to them to fund grassroots projects. "The aim is to increase participation rates, provide more regular domestic playing opportunities for women and girls and ultimately strengthen domestic capacity. It is hoped that an increase in domestic participation will lead to the recommencement of this event in the future."


Read More..

SLC baggage master PD Nimal dies in accident

SLC's baggage master PD Nimal has died after being struck down in a traffic accident, the board has announced. Nimal handled the player's kits and bags for 15 years, working for both SLC and the Sinhalese Sports Club, and was a popular figure among players and administrators.

Nimal would often assist the national team during fielding drills, earning him the unofficial title of "Assistant Fielding Coach". He was the object of such sweeping affection, international players regularly brought him gifts from overseas tours.

"Nimal was an honest and hardworking team member who was always willing to do anything for the benefit of the team and the game of cricket in the country," SLC said. "He will be missed by all the cricketers young and old who played for SSC and Sri Lanka."


Read More..

Bad news to ponder as Sri Lanka head north

Sri Lanka will take heart from the draw at Lord's, Angelo Mathews said at the end of the match. But as the team heads to chilly, unfamiliar Headingley they have enough bad news to temper their mood.

Wicketkeeper-batsman Prasanna Jayawardene's finger injury is more serious than first believed, and he will be unavailable. Meanwhile, Suranga Lakmal's hamstring tear continues to keep him out of the side, even though it was expected to have healed in time for the second Test. It is something of a Sri Lankan trait to be optimistic, but sunny diagnoses have worked against them here. Perhaps Sri Lanka would do well to pick up another team doctor in Yorkshire.

The injuries open up selection quandaries for Mathews and Sri Lanka, but their options will be weighed against their intentions for the match. Sri Lanka have a shot at glory in Leeds. If they win the Test, they will have won their first ever Test series in England (not including the one-off result at the Oval in 1998). But Mathews has so far been unmoved by shots at glory in Tests. The fear of losing has had more influence on Sri Lanka's long-format cricket in recent years.

A loss at Headingley will not have quite undone Sri Lanka's work in the limited-overs series, but it might dampen the tour, and reinforce the notion they remain long-format lightweights. A drawn series, meanwhile, would suit Sri Lanka fine.

England had the better of the running at Lord's and may again at Headingley, but details are eroded more quickly in the public memory than the scoreline. During the first Test Mahela Jayawardene also hinted at the team's frustration of having only two Tests in England, while India, who have a poorer recent record in the country, get five. Sri Lanka partly have their own board to blame for the scheduling, but nevertheless, a squared series might be an effective means of highlighting injustices in the Test calendar.

But Sri Lanka will also know a draw at Headingley is far from a foregone thing. Of the 14 most recent Tests there, stretching back to 1997, 13 games have yielded results. Of those 13, the teams have been separated by an innings five times. Only on two occasions has a game been decided by a slimmer margin than five wickets or 100 runs. These numbers - and a cloudy forecast - suggest Sri Lanka might do well to adopt all-out aggression, because a draw seems even less likely than a victory.

Sri Lanka's fast bowlers are now accustomed to vitriol from outspoken former players, whenever they tour overseas, but Shaminda Eranga's fourth day spell at Lord's was perhaps the best of the match until James Anderson's reverse-swing laced burst on Monday. Having regained his line and rhythm after a wayward first innings, Eranga will again be tasked with leading the pace attack. Which quick men he should have in support, is what Sri Lanka must ponder.

Nuwan Pradeep was penetrative on the first day at Lord's and despite a familiar dip in speed in the second innings, he remained economical enough to warrant selection in Leeds. But Nuwan Kulasekara's place in the side will be under more intense scrutiny.

There is no doubt Kulasekara can move the ball further than his teammates, but he does so at such a gentle pace, he posed few troubles for a green England top order. He would, on the surface, appear the safe choice for Sri Lanka. If the conditions do not allow for movement, he is supposed to be the man to lock up one end. Though he travelled at 4.33 runs an over in the second innings, Mathews spoke highly of his efforts after the match.

"Nuwan Kulasekara bowled pretty well, along with Eranga," he said. "They were hitting the right lines and lengths and bowling with a lot of pace. That was encouraging."

Dhammika Prasad, who bowls with considerably better pace than Kulasekara, and also had a successful outing in Northampton, may be in prime contention to make the XI on Friday. Sri Lanka's worry with Prasad, is that he is something of a wild card: intense and intimidating on some days, but fodder for good players of pace on others. With an unpredictable Pradeep already in the attack, Prasad may seem a risky choice. Sri Lanka also have left-armer Chanaka Welegedara in their ranks, but it is unclear whether he has regained full pace following a spate of lengthy injuries.

There are also vulnerabilities in the batting that must be addressed, but given the men on tour, Sri Lanka almost have no option than to go with the expected top seven. Dimuth Karunaratne keeps getting in and getting out. Lahiru Thirimanne combusts every time James Anderson lines him up. And though Dinesh Chandimal - who will likely take the gloves - still averages over 50 in Tests, his horror run in limited-overs cricket will take some getting over.

Headingley, with its reputation for cloudy days and vicious swing, seems an unlikely place for a Sri Lanka win. If the visitors are to give themselves some chance, they cannot afford to tactical missteps before the match has even begun.


Read More..

Panesar 'very difficult' to select - Moores

As well as England's attack performed to push them within a wicket of victory on the final day at Lord's, they were screaming out for a specialist spinner, especially while they waited for the ball to reverse swing.

Moeen Ali did little wrong on his debut, picking up a notable maiden Test wicket in Kumar Sangakkara, and was not overawed by the situation. But nor did he cause the Sri Lankans many concerns, apart from one delivery on the final day which nearly took Sangakkara's edge to gully.

The ideal plan in the post-Graeme Swann era would have been to return to Monty Panesar, who played second fiddle to Swann but still has 167 Test wickets at 34.71. However, such are his problems, some form-related yet mostly off the field, that it appears he is further from consideration than he has ever been.

Peter Moores, the England coach, made it clear he was not in their immediate thoughts. "Monty is the most experienced Test match bowler but through other issues he has made it very difficult to look at him at the moment as an option," Moores said. "The key is to ... put himself up for selection like anyone else. Monty has to get himself in that place."

Panesar was given a second chance by the previous selection regime when he was named in the Ashes squad to tour Australia despite a season which had seen him fined for urinating on a bouncer outside a nightclub. That incident prompted a move from Sussex to Essex, where he then signed a permanent two-year contract, but this season he was dropped for timekeeping issues.

His figures in first-class cricket this summer are 26 wickets at 26.00. That puts him second among England-qualified spinners, behind Kent's Adam Riley, who has 33 wickets at 27.24. In the Sunday Times, Andrew Strauss touted Riley as an option for the India series while Kerry O'Keeffe, the former Australia spinner turned renowned commentator, has been impressed by brief glimpses over the internet.

Moores, too, has noted Riley's progress - which has kept James Tredwell out of Kent's Championship team - but has not forgotten Simon Kerrigan, who until six weeks ago was under Moores' charge at Lancashire.

"Kerrigan statistically has been the most prolific in first-class cricket," he said. "If you take that as one of the gauges it puts him in the frame. Obviously Riley has come on the scene.

"We are going to have to identify our next spinner, there's no doubt about that. All sides need the option of a frontline spinner. [One, or a couple] are going to have to play for us to be able to cover all options ... otherwise it is going to be a weakness in our ranks that people will be able to try to exploit."

Moeen's bowling has developed significantly over the last two seasons with Worcestershire, during which time he has averaged 32.56 in the Championship compared to 40.43 overall in his first-class career, but he was only given 12 overs on the final day while Joe Root was used shortly before the second new ball was taken.

It remains to be seen how much of role Moeen will play in the second Test at Headingley, but Moores said he could still be the option when India arrive.

"I think he has the chance at the moment," he said. "He is getting better quite quickly. He is going to have to adjust to take wickets as a Test match bowler."


Read More..

Sri Lanka encouraged by battling draw

Despite a final nerve-wracking session, the tourist had plenty to take away from the first Test as theyavoided a first defeat at Lord's since 1991

'It was a good team effort' - Mathews

Alastair Cook is a defensive captain. Angelo Mathews is a defensive captain. Put their teams together on a flat deck that saw three centuries and a double-hundred, and you have a draw. Right?

For much of day four and some of day five, the Test was headed for that fate, but of course, the cricket gods - purveyors of surprise and perennial makers of mischief - connived to make it so much better than that. The result did not change, but would-be-follicles in Marvan Atapattu's bald scalp will have turned grey, and even Mathews, who has overseen his share of heart-stoppers in his brief time at the helm, appeared shaken from the experience.

The only man in the Sri Lanka camp who seemed to have a grip on the situation, was the same guy who had smashed his own stumps with his bat in the first innings. England had begun raucous celebrations when ice-cold Nuwan Pradeep called for perhaps the most undeniably game-changing review since Galileo decided to take another look at the solar system. Then, when he survived the final ball, he and No. 10 Shaminda Eranga shook hands casually in the middle of the pitch. One can only guess from their body language at the contents of their conversation.

"Shame this match has to end now, no machang? We could have both hit hundreds otherwise."

Earlier, in the afternoon, Kumar Sangakkara had dead batted 31 deliveries in one stretch like he was facing backyard throw downs from his four-year-old daughter, then went over 100 deliveries without a boundary, with not so much as a grunt of frustration. He has gone some way to silencing critics in this match, raising his average significantly in England, where he has struggled in the past. In the second innings, he silenced supporters as well. So many cricket pundits and fans were predicting another ton on Twitter, it seemed almost inevitable that he would fall well short. He cut James Anderson back on to his stumps to truly set some panic in the visiting dressing room.

Later that same over, Lahiru Thirimanne took guard against Anderson. His five most recent international dismissals had all been effected by this one bowler. In seven innings before this against England, Anderson had claimed him four times. The bowler, by now, must feel he only needs to sneeze in Thirimanne's direction to claim his wicket. Thirimanne had been in good nick before the tour, but at present, he is like Superman in Lex Luthor's kryptonite jail cell.

Mathews had an outstanding Test as a batsman, hitting an almost surreptitious century in the first innings, after the crowd had used up all their fanfare on Sangakkara the previous day. Mathews traded in that pizzazz for passivity in the second dig, taking cover in his trench for 89 nerveless balls, before Anderson got the better of him as well. It was the kind of innings that should not hurt personal statistics, but it did. He now only averages 76 each time he comes to the crease as captain. He has undoubtedly grown as a leader, and he has become skilled at deflecting praise and indulging in less-than-enlightening captain-speak as well.

"I'm just trying to give my best to the team, regardless of being the captain or not," Mathews said of his own performance after the match. "I'm working really hard. I always see the big boys working hard. Kumar Sangakkara, Mahela, Dilshan - they all work hard. We've got some inspiration within the team. The senior guys are helping the junior guys as well. Especially in Test cricket, you need to make those changes and bat to the situations. You might need to change your game plan some time. You're always learning."

Tactically, he was somewhat weaker in this match. Given the Sri Lanka top order's recent struggles against swing and seam, Mathews' decision to field first was perhaps understandable, but it was undoubtedly the more conservative option. There were times on the second morning when Sri Lanka forgot their attack was not comprised of Michael Holding, Malcolm Marshall and Zeus. The "lightning-bolts" aimed at the batsmen's heads did some damage, and claimed a few lower-order wickets, but the short-ball plan cost the team over 200 runs as well.

Sri Lanka will have been encouraged by what they saw from Eranga and Pradeep, not so much with the bat, but with the new ball in hand. Eranga's fourth-day spell was perhaps the best in the game until Anderson's day-five burst, and Pradeep had been effective when the pitch took seam on day one.

Ultimately, Lord's threw up the kind of result that will satisfy both teams. England proved they can do something other than draw unbroken streams of ire, and Sri Lanka have avoided a first defeat at Lord's since 1991. Best of all, the finish had a meagre crowd talking, and no one was even mankaded.


Read More..

Cook heard Pradeep inside edge

While his team launched into a celebratory huddle, Alastair Cook knew what he had heard. The edge from Nuwan Pradeep into his pad, which Paul Reiffel missed, was big enough for Cook to pick it from slip. A few moments later the DRS confirmed that what, for seconds, was a Test victory had been snatched away from them.

Then, to add to the agony for the England captain, he watched the last ball of the Test fall agonisingly short of second slip. Stuart Broad fell to his knees and the slips stood motionless until the handshakes started.

"I didn't really move too far from my bar stool at first slip," Cook said. "I did think he nicked it but they everyone started saying it was two pads, so I kind of got excited. But it was a big noise."

He had a wry smile when it was put to him that the decision was vindication of the DRS, a system that England have always been a supporter of and that, last year, England were grateful for when it confirmed Brad Haddin out at Trent Bridge to secure a 14-run win. "Yeah," he said, with the hint of a laugh. "I've always been a big fan of it, it's to stop the howler and unfortunately that was a big inside edge. It's gutting to take at that time.

"But there was the lbw before the new ball from Chris Jordan which was overturned because it was the right decision. As players you want the right decision, even if it's not great at this precise moment in time when it's taken a Test win away but it was the right decision."

The fact England reached the final over needing two wickets for victory, which became one when Broad had Rangana Herath gloving down the leg side - although replays showed Herath's glove was off the bat - was testament to some tireless work either side of tea, sparked by James Anderson's removal of Mahela Jayawardene during a wonderful spell of reverse swing, and then a powerful burst with the new ball which reduced Sri Lanka from 159 for 2 with the game seemingly dead.

"At tea it looked quite a long way away but when you get so close and then get a decision which wins you a Test overturned it's quite hard to take," Cook said. "But it was a great Test, that's what it's about, to go all the way down to the wire and for both sides to leave nothing out there."

Cook showed invention in the field during the match, although largely in the final session after England waited desperately for the ball to reverse, but acknowledged that an 8-1 field which appeared after tea - including a circle of close catchers on the off side - had been the work of Anderson. "I wish I could take credit, but I can't." he said.

With England coming so close to victory there will inevitably be further debate of Cook's declaration which came before play on the final morning rather than late on the fourth day to give his quicks an early dart with new ball.

Cook said the batting collapse on Sunday afternoon - which left them 121 for 6, a lead of 243 - had cost them valuable time, meaning they could not accelerate until the closing overs. In the end, England made 59 runs in seven overs - which included Ballance reaching his maiden hundred with a six - although there remained an argument that the foot could have been put on the throttle when the lead passed 300.

"If you'd declared at 330-340 on that wicket it would have been a very fair chase," Cook said. "At 100 for 1 at lunch, 320 would have looked a very short total. The four wickets just after lunch cost us without shadow of a doubt and give Sri Lanka credit there. We tried to play positively to give us a chance of declaring that night but they made it difficult for us."

There were also 17 overs lost in the match due to slow over-rates, six of those on the day England were in the field throughout on Saturday, and speaking to Sky Sports Cook admitted that had not been ideal.

But he was delighted with the way his team played throughout the Test, their first outing in the format since the conclusion of the 5-0 Ashes whitewash in Australia. Only five players from Sydney remained, but most of the new or recalled players produced significant roles in the match.

"We've made quite a lot of the running in this Test. To lose the toss, be put in and make 580 you have a great chance," he said. "We were ahead throughout the game so can take a lot from that.

"We scored at a really good rate. If we'd gone at three runs an over we wouldn't have been in that position with a chance to win. Joe Root was outstanding with a double and Gary Ballance showed his class at international level, not many people have seen it and it will be great for his confidence from a tricky position at No. 3. All the new guys came in and made an impact."

It will be the same players travelling up to Headingley after an unchanged squad was confirmed, the playing XI plus Chris Woakes, but it is unlikely that Woakes will push himself into the side. There was a suggestion that Broad may have been suffering a niggle towards the end of the match, when he was replaced by Liam Plunkett for one over, but Cook said it had just been a hunch. It was a hunch that did not quite work.


Read More..

Plenty of ticks for England selectors

'We were ahead throughout the game' - Cook

There were six changes for the Lord's Test compared to the England side which took the field at the SCG in January. ESPNcricinfo assesses how each of them performed in the opening match of the series

Sam Robson

A tricky start for England's latest opener on his homeground. He edged to the keeper in the first innings, reaching for ball that travelled down the slope, and was then beaten by one holding its line in the second. Regardless of success at domestic level, the step up will bring challenges more often than not and it would be unfair to make snap judgements after two innings although to be troubled on both sides of the bat is a concern. Would be ideal, before the arrival of India, if he could settle himself with a useful score at Headingley.

Joe Root

His absence from the Test side only lasted one match and his double hundred has set up his summer beautifully. Continued a strong association with Lord's where he scored 180 against Australia last year and 71 against New Zealand. The tempo of his first innings was what stood out. Often in Australia he became static, unable to rotate the strike, but back down at No. 5 he seemed far more at ease. After a year of shuffling around the order, hopefully he has now found a permanent home especially after Gary Ballance's corresponding hundred at No.3. "It's obviously been quite a tough winter, from a team point of view and personally as well," Root said. "So to come back into the side and score a hundred meant a lot to me."

Moeen Ali

Moeen certainly did not look out his depth in the Test arena. Off the mark with a whip through square leg, the only nervous moment in his first innings was an edge through a vacant third slip. The rest of his stay was studded with wristy elegance, so much so that when he edged a loose drive to slip it came as a surprise. The second innings was brief, but action-packed: off the mark first ball with a lofted straight drive then bowled through the gate by a lovely response from Rangana Herath. The bowling was what you would expect, steady but without a huge amount of threat against batsmen who can play spin in their sleep. "I think he looks like someone who has already played 20 games," Paul Farbrace said. "I thought he looked at ease with the bat and with the ball he looks like a very quick learner. He has a great future."

Matt Prior

Lucky to be recalled? Maybe, but Prior took his opportunity although it was a successful return by a matter of inches when he escaped a mighty close lbw second ball. But after that, he played very much like the Prior of old, counter-attacking against a tiring attack on the first day although he will not have enjoyed being bounced out by Shaminda Eranga. With the gloves he was solid, the horrors of Perth forgotten, and generally coped well with the low bounce that made life tricky behind the stumps. "I've had a rough year but the three or four years before that I'd played some pretty good cricket and I know what I bring to the team," Prior said.

Chris Jordan

There is a vibrancy and exuberance about Jordan's cricket that is impossible not to admire. A wicket with his third ball in Test cricket would have settled any remaining nerves, but he does not appear to be the type of cricketer to be overwhelmed by an occasion. Three hard-earned scalps in the first innings were just rewards and his final spell of the match - 8-7-2-1 - was unstinting. The other side of his game was on show when he strode in with England 121 for 6 in the second innings. Ian Bell would have been proud of some of the off side drives he played during a sparky 35 which eased England's worries. "We've seen quite a lot of Jords in the one-day game, he's got a lot of skills," Alastair Cook said. "I love his attitude, he always wants to bowl. He's nagging me from second slip saying he needs to come on now, it's an infectious attitude and we haven't seen the best of him yet either."

Liam Plunkett

Match figures of 48-7-155-2 did not scream a successful return to Test cricket for Plunkett after a seven-year gap, but neither do they tell the full story of the effort he put in. It was a foreboding surface for anyone trying to extract life with short deliveries - a method of attack England were keen to take against the Sri Lankans - but Plunkett still had the strength and stamina to have the batsmen hopping at times with speeds in excess of 90mph. He may, occasionally, have forgotten the value of the pitch-up delivery and his yorker to remove Angelo Mathews in the first innings should be one to file away, but he should feel heartened heading to his new homeground for the second Test. "Liam has got one of the best engines I've seen, his pace pretty much stayed constant through the whole game," Cook said.


Read More..

Pradeep was confident - Mathews

Arnold: Cricket was the winner

Nuwan Pradeep approached the last five balls of the match with confidence, as he walked out to deny Stuart Broad and England, his captain Angelo Mathews revealed after the match.

Pradeep swayed away from a bouncer first ball - avoiding a reprise of his hit wicket from the first innings - then played and missed at a back-of-a-length delivery, and fended the third one away towards point.

Next ball - the penultimate delivery of the match - raised a raucous appeal from the hosts, and the batsman was given out by Paul Reiffel, only for the decision to be immediately reviewed. Replays showed Pradeep got a big inside edge, and lived on. The final delivery was edged to slip, but it only reached the fielder on the bounce.

"All Pradeep said to me was, 'Don't worry, I'm going to hold on. If they bowl short at me I'm just going to leave it'." Mathews said of his exchange with Sri Lanka's No. 11 before he went out to bat. "That was very encouraging from the tail-ender. I actually thought he did that exact thing. When they went for the lbw, we were not confident, because we couldn't see from behind. But he was pretty confident that he hit it, and thank God that he did."

Pradeep's lbw decision was the second piece of drama in the over after Rangana Herath gloved a short ball to the wicketkeeper - but his hand had already come off the bat handle. Herath did not wait for the umpire's decision to begin walking back to the pavilion.

"I guess Rangana wasn't aware of the rules," Mathews said. "It's a lesson learned. We all now know that if it hits your hand and it's off the bat you're not out."

Pradeep showed presence of mind to call for the review, even as England celebrated around him. "It wasn't the easiest time for Pradeep to go and bat, and to review the decision was also a brave effort. In that tense situation, your mind goes blank sometimes. It's always good to review it and luckily we used it. We hung in there."

Mathews was less enamoured by Sri Lanka's collapse either side of tea. The visitors had eight wickets in hand with 36 overs to play in the day, but lost three quickly to James Anderson's reverse swing, and were under immense pressure in the final session.

Mathews and Prasanna Jayawardene batted out 20 overs together, despite Jayawardene's severely bruised finger, before Rangana Herath faced 13 balls, until being dismissed.

"I thought we batted poorly after tea especially. The bowlers came and gave one last effort, and we fell for that. I thought Anderson bowled really well. Their seamers bowled hard and asked questions from our batters but we couldn't really handle it after tea. It shouldn't have got close.

"It was a great effort from our lower middle-order. Rangana Herath did well, and so did Prasanna, with a broken finger. He had had painkiller injections to keep going. It was a good effort in the end, but after tea we were too relaxed."

Alastair Cook faced some criticism for delaying his declaration, and Angelo Mathews said Sri Lanka were always unlikely to attempt chasing 390 on the final day.

"They could have declared earlier, maybe. Close to 400 runs to get on the last day is going to be a tough ask. The wicket was spinning a little bit, and it was playing up and down a little bit as well. We had to bat sensibly.

"We were going in a 50-50 mode. We wanted to bat till lunch, then tea, then see how we were. We were in a pretty bad situation after tea, and we couldn't do anything but go for the draw."


Read More..