Giles 'considered not coming back'

Giles won't promise 'quick fix' for Lancashire

Ashley Giles admitted he considered his future as a coach before accepting the job of Lancashire's new cricket director and head coach on a three-year contract. Giles, whose last assignment as England's limited overs coach ended in late March, takes over a county who have suffered two Championship relegations in the last three years.

Giles was unveiled at a press conference at Old Trafford flanked by chairman Michael Cairns, the decision maker in this period of change for the county, chief executive Daniel Gidney and Glen Chapple, who will be his right-hand man.

Chapple put his own name forward to take on the coach's role, but instead he will work under Giles and potentially continue his playing career as a seam bowler beyond his 41st birthday in January. Chapple spent the majority of the summer in charge of first-team affairs both as a coach and captain following the departure of Peter Moores to England in April. Mike Watkinson vacated his role as cricket director earlier this week.

With Chapple concentrating on his coaching commitments and only playing when needed, that means one of Giles's first tasks is to appoint a new captain. Current vice captain and opening batsman Paul Horton is the early frontrunner.

"I considered not coming back into coaching, I wouldn't be ashamed of admitting that," Giles said, having made his Test debut at Old Trafford in 1998. "But I love working with teams. It is a really good place to be.

"I've been lucky that the timing has been right. Being out of the game for a few months was healthy. I spent time with the family reflecting on my experiences with England. I was away in India doing some media stuff, and that experience reinforced my desire to get back into coaching. It's not that I didn't enjoy that experience, but I love improving players.

"My conversation with Michael Cairns and Daniel Gidney happened over the last week or so, and as soon as I started talking to them, to be talking to a club with the history and size of this, it was a fantastic opportunity.

"It's clearly been a difficult six months since Pete left. Chappie has done a fantastic job to do three roles this summer. It gives us a platform to build from. In my discussions, it's been very much not about a quick fix. I'm sure everyone wants to hear me say we'll be straight back in Division One, and I hope we are. Most importantly, it's about building something that is sustainable and is going to be successful over a long period, and that does take time."

Giles also admitted that "I'm over it" with regards to his two years in charge of England's limited overs teams: "I'm not stupid enough to think we always get what we want and there's always a fairytale ending.

"There will be a lot I've learnt from England, about managing players in particular. Managing players at that level is different to managing players at county level. Of course the whole media attention and bubble surrounding international cricket is slightly different, and you get slightly less time to do things you might want to do. It's also a great environment, and there are a lot of good people there. But it didn't work out."

A decision will be taken much closer to the start of next season as to how much, if any, cricket Chapple plays. "The position I've been offered here, I see as a very challenging one and probably just the right thing for me at this stage." Chapple said. His official title has yet to be confirmed. "The option of carrying on playing means I don't just have to say 'that's it'. As it stands, I'm very happy."


Read More..

SA focus on schools development

A range of new development programmes around the country is expected to help South Africa strengthen its schools cricket system and speed up transformation

Insufficient exposure to pressure situations at school level could be one of the factors behind South Africa's poor record in the knockout matches of major tournaments. At least that is one of the things administrators have been mulling as the national side prepares itself for next year's World Cup, and they are concentrating on strengthening the pipeline that will sustain the sport in the country in future.

"There is not enough high-intensity, serious competition in schools cricket," Haroon Lorgat, CSA's CEO said, at the launch of a regional performance centre programme in Langa, Cape Town. "Fifteen and sixteen-year-olds need to be bowling that last over with the whole school's fortune on their shoulders. When they do it then, it becomes a lot easier to face those crucial moments at international level. Some of our players face it for the first time at international level and that may be why we've struggled."

Lorgat pointed to Sri Lanka as an example of a more robust schools system which produces players who are equipped for elite level at a younger age. "In Sri Lanka, the majority of their players come competitively out of schools cricket. There is a huge gap between our schools,club cricket to international cricket," he said.

To try and bridge that gap, CSA, in partnership with local government and cricket clubs, is launching a range of development programmes around the country. It will focus on providing facilities and coaching for promising cricketers who may not have access to them otherwise.

CSA is also hoping to achieve another aim through the same methods - speed up transformation, which the country's sports ministry has emphasised over the last few months. Lorgat described the programme as a way for cricket to "access the majority of the population", a reference to the almost 80% of black Africans in the country, of whom only five have played Test cricket and only one, Makhaya Ntini, lasted for a substantial enough period to earn more than 100 caps.

The lack of black African cricketers, especially at international level, has been at the top of CSA's list of concerns and the steps it is taking to change that start at grassroots, specifically schools and clubs. More than 80% of South Africa's international players are products of previously advantaged schools, of which the country has many reputable ones, who play up to 16 matches a season. In contrast, players at disadvantaged schools manage just five matches, which leaves a vast amount of untapped talent.

The new centres will seek to change that by identifying a minimum of four junior and four senior schools in each of the 46 areas CSA has chosen for the programme. Those schools will participate in league matches at clubs, that will receive assistance to upgrade facilities, access to qualified coaches and equipment and their transport will be taken care of. They will play a minimum of 20 matches a season, and some could be against more established schools teams to ensure the level of competition is raised across the board.

Langa, just outside Cape Town, is one of the areas were the project will be rolled out. It is an area with a rich history in cricket, best documented by the one street on which Thami Tsolekile, Temba Bavuma and Malusi Siboto all lived. While Tsolekile now plays at the Lions, he will be involved in the Langa project along with Gary Kirsten and said it his goal that "cricket does not fade in our communities."

The heightened focus on transformation at lower levels does not mean CSA has ignored change higher up. This season, quotas were increased at franchise and provincial levels, where teams now have to field five and six players of colour respectively. At franchises, at least two of those five players must be black Africans while provincial teams should have at least three black Africans. "With a minority playing the game, we are the best in the world. Can you imagine how long we can sustain that if we access the majority?" Lorgat asked.

But he warned that South African fans should not take their team's status as a guarantee, especially as Australia could take the Test mace off them with a win in their forthcoming series against Pakistan. "It would be naive for us to sit back and think that because we are the No.1 team in the world today, we will stay there," Lorgat said. "If you look at West Indies, they were the best through the 1970s and 1980s and then all the other teams developed and overtook them."


Read More..

Ramdin's prolific run and Samuels' India record

27 Number of times India have been bowled out for less than 200 against West Indies, the most against any country. Pakistan have also done this 27 times, while Australia's tally is 25.

3 Number of times Dwayne Bravo has opened the innings for West Indies in ODIs. His innings against India was the first since 2008, when he scored 2 against Sri Lanka in Port-of-Spain.

60 West Indies' win percentage in ODIs over the last year, in which they have won nine out of 15 ODIs. The only teams with a better win percentage during this period are Sri Lanka (64%) and South Africa (73%). India, on the other hand, have only won 12 of the 29 ODIs in the last year, with a win percentage of 41.

246 Number of overs bowled by Ravindra Jadeja over the last year, the most by a bowler in ODIs. The next three on this list are Indians too - R Ashwin, Mohammed Shami and Bhuvneshwar Kumar. This is partly down to India having played 29 ODIs in this period, more than any other team. Pakistan, Sri Lanka and South Africa are the other teams that have played more than 20 games.

9 Number of 50-plus scores by Marlon Samuels against India in ODIs. His next best is five against Bangladesh. He has two hundreds against India and Pakistan, and eight 50-plus scores in India, the most outside the West Indies. Samuels has nine 50-plus scores in the West Indies.

10 Number of West Indian batsmen who have scored 4000-plus runs in one-day cricket. Samuels joined the list during his innings of 126 not out. Overall, 91 batsmen have reached this landmark.

63.3 Denesh Ramdin's batting average over the last 12 months, while also keeping wicket for West Indies. Among wicket-keepers who have played at least 10 ODIs in this period, only MS Dhoni has a better batting average (70.6).

32 Number of ODI wickets taken by Shami in 2014 - the most by any bowler. He started the game on 28 wickets, one behind Lasith Malinga, but his haul of 4 for 66 took him to the top.

14 Number of 50-plus partnerships by the Indian openers over the last two years; no other team has more. The openers posted 49 runs against West Indies and, over the last two years, have averaged 45.2, the best for a top-ten side.

9 Number of single figure scores for Virat Kohli in his last 16 international innings, starting with the Test series in England earlier this year. He has only two 40-plus scores in this period.


Read More..

Suspect actions allowed 'for way too long' - Ponting

Ricky Ponting has joined the list of former players supporting the recent crackdown on chucking, declaring that suspect actions had been allowed to go on "for way too long". He said eliminating illegal actions from the game would have been "the first thing that would come to mind" for many players of the past 15 years if asked how to improve the game.

Zimbabwe's Prosper Utseya and Bangladesh's Sohag Gazi on Wednesday became the latest spinners to be banned from bowling in international cricket as part of the ICC's ongoing purge. They have joined Pakistan's Saeed Ajmal, Sri Lanka's Sachithra Senanayake and New Zealand part-timer Kane Williamson in being suspended from bowling in recent months.

A number of bowlers, including West Indies offspinner Sunil Narine and Pakistan allrounder Mohammad Hafeez, were also reported for suspect actions during the recent Champions League T20 tournament. Ponting said he was a supporter of the ICC crackdown and said many former players thought something should have been done about it.

"I'm absolutely for it," Ponting told Cricket Australia's website. "I believe a lot of that's gone on for way too long. You ask all the players who have played in the last 15 years, and probably the first thing that would come to mind that they would like to change in the game would be eradicating some of the actions that have been more than just unusual if you like, or suspect.

"There's been some [actions] - as we've seen with some of the degrees that have been reported over the last couple of weeks - [that have] been quite extreme, and I'm a big supporter of trying to eradicate those sorts of actions out of the game."

Ajmal was suspended from bowling after ICC testing found that he flexed his elbow more than twice the legal limit. A number of current and former players have supported the ICC crackdown, although some such as Viv Richards have questioned the timing, with a World Cup less than six months away.


Read More..

Revealed: the case against Pietersen

ESPNcricinfo is in possession of a legal document that provides a clear insight into the ECB state of mind as it contends with the fallout from the end of Kevin Pietersen's England career.

The existence of one or more Pietersen documents has been a subject of contention since Pietersen walked off the field in Sydney last January for the last time in an England shirt. This one covers the Ashes series and illustrates how he has been cast as a serial offender whose alleged behaviour undermined the authority of the coach and captain.

Pietersen himself refers in his autobiography to being alerted within days of the end of the Ashes series to the existence of what he prefers to dismiss as an "imaginary dossier".

This is not quite the dirty dossier the cricket world hankers after. It was, however, drawn up to assist the ECB legal team. It outlines the breakdown in relationships between Pietersen and the England team director, Andy Flower, which is forthrightly described in the autobiography.

The ECB confirmed the document was part of the Pietersen analysis, but stated: "It is simply part of a privileged legal document, produced by the ECB's lawyers compiling information as part of the ECB's internal due diligence ahead of the release of the Kevin Pietersen book."

It is recorded that Pietersen "ranted" at Flower after the Melbourne Test - a conversation he has recorded in some detail in his autobiography. But Pietersen has been less forthcoming about the document's allegation that he described Alastair Cook's captaincy as "weak" and "tactically inept". In that same heated meeting, Graeme Swann, who has dismissed Pietersen's autobiography as "a work of fiction", is allegedly described as "a c***".

The document then solemnly observes that Flower did not speak to Pietersen during the final Test in Sydney or, indeed, for the rest of the tour.

The five-page document, marked STRICTLY PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL, has reached ESPNcricinfo independently and seeks to assemble evidence of Pietersen's rebellious and agitated state of mind as England careered to a 5-0 defeat in the Test series. There are sound reasons to regard it as playing a genuine part in the negotiations.

Elements of this document are now being leaked into the public domain and are believed to be only part of a much larger analysis of Pietersen's allegedly recalcitrant behaviour during the final years of his England career which seems to counter his self-portrayal as a victimised player bullied by an England clique.

The charge sheet against Pietersen is unlikely to bring unity. Some will contend that the ECB had assembled convincing reasons to end an association with a player who had clearly become a liability, whereas others will regard it as essentially a petty victimisation of Pietersen which fails to disguise a sorry failure of man management.

As with the reaction to his autobiography, the dividing lines are likely to remain as deep as ever.

The document gives a flavour of the clash between Flower's severe managerial regime and Pietersen's more freewheeling approach to life when it considers an incident several days before the second Test in Adelaide.

"Upon arrival in Adelaide for the Second Test, AF [Andy Flower] gave express instructions to players not to stay out late and not to give the scandal-voracious press any ammunition, which KP immediately disobeyed by taking out two young players drinking with him until late (an incident which was front page news in the Adelaide press the following day)."

With England 2-0 down before the Perth Test, the dossier earnestly records that "an England team physiotherapist" told Flower that if England lost the Test his knee was "really going to be playing up". This is presumably taken to be the language of insubordination.

The report states: "Prior to the Perth Test, an England team physiotherapist approached AF to inform AF that KP had told him that KP was looking to do anything to go home after the Perth Test if England lost the match to go 3‐0 down. KP allegedly told the physio that if England lost the match, his knee was "going to be really playing up".

It was after the fourth Test, though, that the relationship between Flower and Pietersen finally foundered for good. The notes read:

"- KP stated that AC [Alastair Cook] was weak, tactically inept and that AC's latest effort to galvanise the team was "pathetic".

- KP ranted, saying GS [Graeme Swann] is a "c***", the team was "s***" and having a go at AF and his coaching.

- KP stated that, in order to build team spirit, AF needed to "let the players go out and get p*ssed, especially the younger players".

- AF told KP at the end of the meeting that he was amazed that after 7 years of working together and AF bending over backwards for KP, that KP would talk to AF like that and be so incredibly disloyal as to try to get rid of AF like that behind AF's back. KP then left AF's hotel room."

Further charges follow, not all of them immediately seeming of import: criticism of Michael Carberry's ability, a complimentary comment about Gary Ballance's South African accent and, a sin that has gained unusual publicity, and a habit which he explains in his book that he picked from his father, an unappealing tendency after being dismissed towards casually whistling.

Even Piers Morgan gets a mention. "It riled the team and management that KP allowed Piers Morgan to belittle AC [Alastair Cook] and the team on social media. When asked by some of his team mates to get Piers Morgan to stop tweeting about the team, KP laughed at the players and told them to get a thicker skin."

After the Ashes series the end came quickly.

"AF was asked for his view on whether KP should form part of England team re-building process. AF said that AC and the Vice-Captain would struggle to re-build the team with sufficient unity or strength with KP involved."

The report then refers to the severance of Pietersen's contract with the observation that "the team needs to move on in a different direction with an emphasis on a strong, team-orientated culture."

This story was updated at 1750 on October 7 to clarify the nature of the document and 1850 with the ECB statement


Read More..

Chingoka named ZC's honorary life president

Less than three months after stepping down as Zimbabwe Cricket (ZC) chairman, following more than two decades at the helm, Peter Chingoka has been named one of the organisation's honorary life presidents. Chingoka joins Alwyn Pichanick and Dave Ellman-Brown, the other recipients of this title.

Although largely a ceremonial position, which is celebrated by extending invitations to matches and other events, honorary life presidents can also attend ZC AGMs and consultative forums. Chingoka is expected to act in an advisory capacity for ZC and may also represent them at the ICC.

ZC have had a troubled relationship with its other two life presidents. During one of its many unsettled periods, Pichanick and Ellman-Brown were stripped of their titles. Both men were outspoken in their criticism of the Chingoka regime.

They were later reinstated and have since been involved in the game. Pichanick was offered the role of an arbitrator by ZC in a dispute with players over payment earlier this year while Ellman-Brown has served on the country's Sports and Recreation Committee and was involved in events like ZC's awards in 2010, where he gave the vote of thanks speech.

Chingoka is certain to have more of a role to play as ZC aims to get its own in order amid spiraling debt which may be why the decision to elevate Chingoka to the life presidency position was made unanimously by ZC board members. "The approval by the affiliates of the invitation for you to become an Honorary Life President of ZC is testimony of your impeccable record of service to Zimbabwe cricket," Wilson Manase, Chingoka's successor and current chairman said.


Read More..

Full text of Dwayne Bravo's letter to WIPA president Hinds

The following is a copy of a letter ESPNcricinfo has obtained, written on October 7, by West Indies Players Association players' representative and ODI captain Dwayne Bravo to WIPA president and chief executive Wavell Hinds.

"Dear Mr. Hinds,

We refer to our last correspondence to you dated October 6th, where we the players suggested as a way forward that "The players are proposing in light of the above and our previous correspondence, that we continue with the same old payment structure which was previously agreed by WIPA and WICB until we are in a position to properly be informed of all the WICB's finances etc, have an input in the decision making process and more importantly negotiate an acceptable agreement in an attempt to arrive at a win-win resolution. For the avoidance of doubt, this old payment structure will continue and remain in effect until a new agreement is mutually reached between the Players and the WICB". We are of the view that this proposal would be an acceptable way forward since everything remains the same and more importantly neither the WICB nor the players are in a disadvantageous position while we continue to discuss further.

We are disappointed with the lack of proper representation and the players are now forced to make this proposal without any details as to how this new purported agreement was even arrived at and by whom, since the only advice we have received from you as President and CEO of WIPA is to not sign the contract /agreement that was sent by the WICB. The players are of the view that as a matter of principle, we should not accept these conditions whereby we are being asked to play a series against India without any certainty of what are our obligations and what we will be playing for.

As you would appreciate Mr. Hinds, this is how we as professional cricketers earn our livelihood and provide for our families, our careers are short and uncertain, furthermore it is a highly competitive and stressful environment as one bad performance can see you out of the team forever, a player can suffer an injury at any time which could not only be career threatening but in many cases affect their lives even after their playing days are over. Mr. Hinds, the list can go on and on.

As we have indicated to you earlier, the players here in India are under tremendous stress and the team morale is at an all-time low. We believe that this present WIPA Executive under your leadership has failed to properly represent the best interest of ALL the players. Many are questioning whether there is now some "special relationship" between the WICB and WIPA which may be good for some but has not taken into account the whole picture resulting in the what may be seen as embarrassing and demonizing some players who represent the WI, yet signaling to public that this new purported agreement (MOU) is in the best interest of West Indies Cricket. This is evidenced by the inaccurate WIPA press statement which was sent after we raised our strong objections to you both verbally and in writing.

Mr. Hinds, we have over the past few days raised a number of questions which have not been answered even though you should have firsthand knowledge of the facts. We find it worrying that you would want to have a Board meeting to determine who were the lawyers and IR persons used for the negotiations of this agreement. This has led us to do our own preliminary investigation which has informed us to date of the following, which we will stand corrected as we await your written response later today.

1) There were little or no legal advice sought in the negotiating of this purported new MOU between the WICB and WIPA.
2) There were little or no Industrial Relations advice sought during the negotiations of the purported new MOU.
3) None of the players were consulted during and after the negotiations of this purported new MOU. This is a process that has been the common practice between previous WIPA representatives and the players. This was completely ignored.
4) The Players were never given the opportunity to consider the document (MOU) and approve it before it was signed consistent with past practice.
5) The first time any agreement was seen by the players was a match/tour contract with a new fee structure significantly different from what we received in the past. This was given to us in India.
6) To date, the players have still not seen this new purported MOU between the WICB and WIPA.
7) The players rights which we have protected through many negotiations and Arbitrations have been given away for nothing.
8) Questions raised by some WIPA Board members were ignored.
9) The WIPA Board never approved the new purported MOU before it was signed.
10) WIPA is receiving in addition to the 3% of all players earnings, a sum of $500,000.00 USD annually from WICB (1% 0f WICB Revenue) once this new agreement remains.

As indicated in our earlier correspondence the reduction is unacceptable and as one of our members put it "it is ridiculously insane" when one considers the massive cuts based on the information we have received:

1) Our Test/ODI/T20 fees have been decreased by 75%
2) No compensation for the use of our rights. That has been decreased by 100%
3) Our ICC fees have been decreased by close to 100%

Perhaps Mr. Hinds, the confusion of the plethora of positions that you occupy being Chairman of Selectors for Jamaica Senior team, a Board member of the Jamaica Cricket Association and the dual role of President and CEO of WIPA have in some way contributed to the confusion or perhaps being a member of the same club as Mr. Cameron in some way may have clouded your judgment. However, we as players who are paying members of WIPA demand that proper representation is required. We wish to make it very clear that should the players be forced to take matters into their our own hands, we will not hesitate to take the appropriate action as see fit. We will hold you and the WIPA Board who support this process liable.

Mr. Hinds, the players have raised some further questions that remained unanswered:

1) Have the WICB Board members and staff taken a pay cut as we are being asked to do or at all. Our information is that staff have been increased both in numbers and their salaries.
2) Have the WICB declared their million dollar television deal
3) Have the WICB declared how much they are being paid extra for the matches outside of the FTP like this India tour.
4) Have the WICB declared what they are getting from the sale of CPL to Digicel our most lucrative tournament.
5) Have the WICB declared what they are getting from Digicel as the team sponsor.
6) Have they declared their financial arrangements with Governments for the international and regional home series.

We wish at this stage to once again reiterate our position as a way forward, let us continue under the old structure until we are able to properly negotiate a fair and reasonable agreement in the best interest of West Indies cricket. This in our view is a sensible approach since it would give us players an opportunity to have an input, seek the necessary advice and put our house in order. We have articulated this position to Mr. Richardson, Mr. Pybus and Mr. Lloyd who all understand our position.

It is without question that we want to see West Indies cricket rise again and we are very committed to that process, but the way it is being done is most unfortunate and unacceptable. We believe we are being hoodwinked and are being treated like little school boys, yet we are being asked perform and play against professionals. We appeal for good sense to prevail and that you, who have a responsibility until such time that you hold the position as President and CEO to act in all the players best interest.

We look forward to hearing from you later today.

Regards,

Dwayne Bravo on behalf of the WI Cricket team"


Read More..

West Indies players mull strike over pay structure

In an extraordinary and unprecedented move, West Indies players have come out strongly against the West Indies Players Association (WIPA) president and chief executive Wavell Hinds, who they claim "hoodwinked" them and did not take their inputs while signing a new memorandum of understanding with West Indies Cricket Board last month, under which they would suffer a significant cut in their payment.

It leaves open the possibility of strike action again and in a letter, in possession of ESPNcricinfo, the players' representative, Dwayne Bravo, wrote that the morale within the team, as they prepare for the first ODI against India, to be played on Wednesday in Kochi, was "at an all-time low." Incidentally West Indies skipped the scheduled training session on Tuesday afternoon as well as the media briefing without giving any reason.

It is not yet clear whether the players would indeed go on strike during the India series which includes five ODIs and one Twenty20 followed by three Tests. Such a development would not be far-fetched as the letter noted: "We wish to make it very clear that should the players be forced to take matters into their our own hands, we will not hesitate to take the appropriate action as see fit. We will hold you and the WIPA Board who support this process liable."

The WICB issued a press release in response on Tuesday evening, stating an apology "to the fans, the BCCI and all other stakeholders should the first ODI be disrupted as a result of player action. The WICB is making every effort to ensure that it fulfills all its commitments and that cricket is played."

On September 18, Hinds and WICB president Whycliffe "Dave" Cameron signed a fresh collective bargaining agreement and MoU in Barbados, putting behind a saga of bitter and acrimonious disputes between the two bodies which had resulted in frequent threats of player strikes at a time when West Indies cricket had hit rock bottom. Cameron called the new agreement a "watershed" moment while Hinds said it promoted meritocracy providing a fair share of WICB revenue going to the regional players unlike the old structure where the majority share went to international players.

But Bravo and his team-mates insisted that they would want the old structure back. Only because under the new MoU, the players "understand" their Test, ODI and T20 fees "have been decreased by 75%"; that they will receive "no compensation for the use of our rights. That has been decreased by 100%"; and their ICC fees have been "decreased by close to 100%".

What irked the players the most, they said, was being kept in the dark about the "purported agreement." The letter stated that the first time any agreement was seen by the players was a match/tour contract with a new fee structure "significantly different from what we received in the past. This was given to us in India," Bravo said. It also said the players had been trying to seek answers for Hinds who had not responded, which prompted them to carry their own investigations after which they found out "little or no legal advice" had been taken by WIPA.

The letter reveals that players felt they were never represented properly by WIPA under Hinds. "We are disappointed with the lack of proper representation and the players are now forced to make this proposal without any details as to how this new purported agreement was even arrived at and by whom, since the only advice we have received from you as President and CEO of WIPA is to not sign the contract /agreement that was sent by the WICB. The players are of the view that as a matter of principle, we should not accept these conditions whereby we are being asked to play a series against India without any certainty of what are our obligations and what we will be playing for."

ESPNCricinfo sought responses from WIPA and Hinds but they were unavailable for a comment. Bravo said that the West Indies team management including team manager Richie Richardson, WICB team director Richard Pybus and Clive Lloyd, the selection committee chairman were made aware of the players' stand. "We have articulated this position to Mr. Richardson, Mr. Pybus and Mr. Lloyd who all understand our position."

As a way forward the players want WIPA to re-negotiate the agreement with WICB after the players have included their inputs. "We wish at this stage to once again reiterate our position as a way forward, let us continue under the old structure until we are able to properly negotiate a fair and reasonable agreement in the best interest of West Indies cricket. This in our view is a sensible approach since it would give us players an opportunity to have an input, seek the necessary advice and put our house in order.


Read More..

Shastri to focus on liaising with selectors

Ravi Shastri, the India team director, has said that he has already started liaising with the selectors as part of his new role. In a media interaction in Mumbai, Shastri, whose tenure as team director was extended until the World Cup next year, also said that he hoped to pass on his knowledge and experience to the youngsters in the Indian team during his stint.

The former India captain had been appointed to the role during the ODI series on India's tour of England, after the team suffered a 3-1 loss in the Test series. During the working committee meeting last month, the BCCI agreed to extend his tenure along with the terms of three other support staff members - B Arun, Sanjay Bangar and R Sridhar - who had also been brought in along with Shastri.

"I have already started talking to them [the selection committee] and we have no issues on that. My job is not to select an Indian cricket team, it is their job, but my job is to at least communicate with them and see on what lines they are [thinking] so that we both are on the same page," he said, at the Mumbai Press Club event. "Probably discuss talent, discuss what would be the kind of team you need in Australia.

"See, combinations are very important. You have got to identify your strengths and see who are the right people to manage those roles and areas of your strengths. That importantly comes up with the team. Prime importance, I believe, will always be given to current form. I think form is very important.

"My job is to communicate with whoever is there and I will not take a step back. At the moment, I have been communicating with all the five."

Elaborating on his role with the team, Shastri said he aims to pass on the experience of having played the game at the highest level and watched it closely from the commentary box since his retirement to the young Indian team.

"My job [as director] is to ensure that everything is in order. It's not just about communicating with the players. It's also about giving your views, your inputs as a former player, and as a broadcaster. I've watched more cricket than I've played. So there's enough in this upper-storey here (pointing to his forehead) that can be used before I forget it," he said. "That's what I tell the players. Don't be afraid to ask me questions, because there's enough there for me to be able to contribute. Yes, obviously you'll have to have a dialogue with the selectors as to where they're coming from and what their train of thought is. What we feel as part of the Indian cricket team, so that there's healthy communication and you get something that's best for the Indian cricket team."

While appointing Shastri during the series in England, the BCCI "gave a break" to fielding coach Trevor Penney and bowling coach Joe Dawes, who had worked closely with the team's head coach, Duncan Fletcher. When asked if Fletcher had come to terms with a new support-staff group, Shastri said: "Absolutely, he is brilliant. He is a seasoned campaigner. He has over 100 Test matches as a coach for various teams. The good thing is Fletch and me go a long way back. We know each other. I captained the U-25 team against Zimbabwe in 1984 when he was the captain of Zimbabwe. He has got a fabulous track record. It is how we use the knowledge that he has in the best possible way and communicate with the players."

Shastri reiterated that, despite his and Fletcher's presence in the team, MS Dhoni was the man in charge.

"The boss is the captain on the cricket field. I am in charge of the coaching staff. That's put into place. My job is to oversee things and see things go all right. Who cares who's the boss? At the end of the day, you win and to hell with it, yaar. Jisko boss banna hai bano. [Whoever wants to be the boss, let him do so]."

Shastri contended that the Twenty20 format was crucial for Test cricket to thrive but said that lengthy bilateral T20 and ODI series could be reduced. He suggested that the World Cup and the World T20 should have the most emphasis among limited-overs competitions.

"If you look at cricket per say, if you didn't have T20 cricket, Test cricket will die. People don't realise. You just play Test cricket, and don't play one-day cricket and T20 cricket, and speak to me after 10 years. The economics will just not allow the game to survive," he stated. "You need that injection by the way of T20 cricket. How do you balance it out? Now, is there any need for bilateral T20s? I don't think so. No need for these one-off T20 matches. Pointless. Yes, you want one-day cricket. Even that can be reduced. You don't have to play five-five matches in a series. Keep the emphasis on World Cups, both in T20s and the 50-over formats. Then let your domestic competitions thrive."

Shastri stressed the need for India's top cricketers to play domestic competitions and hoped that the new FTP cycle, which starts after the World Cup, would help India focus on a building a home season.

"That's where you need balance. You open corridors and India, in the new FTP, are planning to do that, where they play two domestic series at home, which I think is the way to go. Why should only Australia or South Africa or England guarantee themselves of a home season. Why can't India? India has enough muscle to put their foot down and say: at this time of the year, we will play cricket in India. We will not go anywhere else. Take it or leave it."

Shastri also clarified that he will be with the Indian team on a full-time basis during the triangular series in Australia, against the hosts and England, and would use the time between Tests to try and watch more domestic cricket.

"That's where I am going to divide my time leading into the World Cup. That's why I've said I'm going to be in and out during this one-day series. Even during the tour of Australia, if there is some big domestic game happening here, and if I feel there's a need for someone who's been there, [I will watch]," Shastri said. "The team is cut-off. The captain, the coaching staff will be cut-off from what's happening here. It won't be a bad idea for someone to come back, watch a couple of games and then head back. There are gaps between Test matches, and you can make the most of it."

Between 2015 and 2023, India are scheduled to play four five-Test series against England and as many four-Test series against Australia. The former India captain, however, has suggested that Test series in the modern era should not exceed three games.

"I believe that tours should be only three Tests. With the amount of these things that is taking place, you will find that once you go for five-Test match series, 80-90% of the times the home team will win and you will see teams going straight down after the third match," he said. "You saw what happened to England during the Ashes in Australia. I am a firm believer that, in the future, just keep all Test series to three because imagine a side coming to India and they are three-zip down after three Test matches...how much interest is there?

"I am looking at all round, I am looking at a bigger picture, I am looking at the crowd sitting and watching, I am looking at television ratings, I am looking at the way the game is going to the future and how you sustain interest from people who want to watch it and follow it. I firmly believe Test series should never be two Test matches, three is enough. Five, Australia-England for tradition is fine. But I still think five is too much."


Read More..

Need good domestic spinners, turning pitches - Misbah

Misbah-ul-Haq has said that Pakistani batsmen struggle at times against quality spin because they are not used to facing it on turning pitches in domestic cricket. Pakistan lost their first four wickets to Australia's spinners and scraped to 96 for 9 on a Dubai turner to lose the only T20 international.

"Sometimes it happens," Misbah said ahead of the first ODI in Sharjah. "When you are not having more spinners at the domestic level, batsmen are not facing more good spinners in domestic competitions … you are not used to facing them.

"You need good spinners at domestic level and you need to have some turners there so the batsmen can get used to them. It is a big factor and if you see, some of the batsmen who have played more of their cricket in Karachi on pitches where it turns a little bit, and they have faced more spinners, they play spin well."

Spin accounted for eight of the 13 wickets that fell in Dubai and Misbah said that the surface would have troubled any batsman. "Obviously on a pitch like the one we played on, both teams were struggling against spin because it was gripping and turning. On a pitch like that any batsman can struggle."

George Bailey said that teams were "doctoring" their pitches to take advantage of the Australians' frailties against spin, but Misbah felt that the visitors had become better players of slow bowling. "Playing in the IPL and getting exposure they have improved against spin. It is not about the Australians. It is about every batsman. If it is turning and the bowler is pitching it in the right areas, you have some trouble but you need to focus on your technique, your basics. Just like fast bowling, for spin you need to have good basics to face it. They are playing spin well at the moment but still even in the last game you see they were having trouble against Shahid Afridi and Raza Hasan, so we can exploit that but at the same time we also have to play spin well."

Misbah said that given the conditions, Pakistan could not depend only on spin going into the series. "You need to have a balance between pace and spin. You normally need five bowlers in a one-day or T20 game. Everybody has to really play his role. You cannot just rely that two spinners will do the damage. The way the Australians bowled on that pitch. Their fast bowlers bowled well, their spinners bowled well. On these pitches, everybody can play his role."

Pakistan are without their lead spinner Saeed Ajmal, who has been banned for an illegal action. Misbah said that Pakistan had no option but to move on in his absence, and felt that left-arm spinner Hasan, who claimed 2 for 17 in the T20, had the potential to step in.

"It is really difficult for anybody to fill in for Saeed Ajmal because he has been the number one or two bowler since last three-four years. Raza Hasan is also a very good bowler. If Saeed is not there somebody has to just raise his hand and try to fill in. I think he (Hasan) showed that in the games before and even yesterday. He can be a bowler who can give something to Pakistan.

"It is really pleasing the way he (Hasan) bowled. He was doing really well in the T20s before he got injured. Got operated. Good sign for Pakistan that he is back. In the one-day series we'll be hoping that he continues to bowl like that."


Read More..