Khawaja defends his work ethic

Usman Khawaja has said the communication from Australia's management around the homework saga in India last year was not strong enough, and the handling of the situation was "very disappointing". Speaking on the latest edition of Alison's Tea Break for ESPNcricinfo, Khawaja also conceded that his relaxed nature could rub people the wrong way, but that his mind was often racing at "a million miles an hour".

Throughout his short nine-Test career, Khawaja has struggled to shake off the perception that he does not work hard enough, or that he is not intense enough at the crease. That was only exacerbated in India when he was one of the four Australia players suspended for failing to complete a task set by the coach Mickey Arthur, who said he hoped it would be the catalyst for Khawaja to realise "we're pretty serious in the Australian cricket team".

"It wasn't fun. It was quite a horrible time to be honest," Khawaja said. "It was disappointing because I knew I was pretty much going to be playing in that Test match, I hadn't officially been told, but I was in. It was just disappointing how it worked out. I don't think the communication was strong enough.

"Firstly I wasn't sure ... I thought it was due before the next Test match. If someone said to me, look, you've got to hand this in by Sunday, or else you're not playing the next Test match, then I promise you, not one person would not hand it in. They'd all hand it in. So there was a bit of communication error. I'm not saying I'm not totally at fault - I should probably listen harder. But it was very disappointing how it was all handled."

Khawaja's omission from the team for the Mohali Test allowed Steven Smith to establish himself with an innings of 92; Smith has scored four centuries and has not missed a Test since then. Khawaja, on the other hand, played three Tests on last year's Ashes tour under new coach Darren Lehmann but was unable to hold his spot. He said although there were times earlier in his career when his work ethic let him down, that was no longer the case.

"I work as hard as everyone else on and off the field," Khawaja said. "I put everything into cricket. I think at time when I was younger there were times when my standards in some places weren't up to scratch and I learnt that quick. Now I make sure that I tick all the boxes, do what I need to do to be in the best state that I can be to win cricket games for my team.

"I think sometimes my relaxed nature and the way I go about things just rubs people the wrong way. I can't help it. When I'm batting and I'm doing stuff, things in my head is going a million miles an hour. When I'm doing stuff it's all going quickly.

"But my exterior is a lot different to what's happening in my head, so I think sometimes people take me in the wrong way if they don't know me well enough. It's something I fought a lot when I was younger but I think when people get to know me they see the real me."


Read More..

Fate of BCCI AGM likely to be known on Sunday

A decision over whether to convene or delay the BCCI's annual general meeting (AGM) is likely to be taken at an informal meeting of BCCI members in Chennai on Sunday. Around 20 of the 30 members are expected to attend as a show of support for the sidelined BCCI president N Srinivasan.

According to one official, "technically" the AGM already stood postponed. "There is a technical glitch as per the BCCI memorandum. The president has to sign the balance sheet. The president has to ask to postpone the AGM. But there is no president," the BCCI official said.

Doubts over the AGM, usually held in the last week of September, emerged immediately after a two-judge bench of the Supreme Court rejected Srinivasan's appeal to be reinstated as BCCI president, which would have allowed him to chair the AGM and likely stand for a third term as BCCI president.

The Court approved a two-month extension to the Mudgal Committee's probe into corruption during last year's IPL and said Srinivasan could not be reinstated in keeping with an order from the court which had said that he could resume office only at the end of the IPL investigation.

ESPNcricinfo understands that around 20 associations, those said to be on Srinivasan's side, are expected to attend the Chennai meeting. It is understood that the units from south and east zone will attend the meeting, as well as the BCCI secretary Sanjay Patel.

The staging of the meeting is being kept a secret. Several state association members who are not Srinivasan supporters, including one of the BCCI vice-presidents, said they were not even aware of such a meeting, let alone being invited.

According to a BCCI office-bearer, the Chennai meeting was not a formal board meeting, but the gathering of "a group" of people to discuss issues pertaining to the AGM. There is growing uncertainty amid member units over whether the AGM and elections could be held before September 30, the last day of BCCI's financial calendar.

The court's order to not allow Srinivasan to resume his duties has resulted in a technical conundrum over BCCI's AGM. According to the BCCI constitution, the AGM has to be convened with a 21-day notice before September 30 which means the last date to convene the AGM should be September 8.

As per the norm, the BCCI calls for a working committee meeting to finalise the date for the AGM in addition to ratifying the annual report and the accounts, which can only be done by the president. With Srinivasan barred from the post, Shivlal Yadav has taken over as the interim president.

There is no clarity over whether Yadav is eligible to ratify the annual report. While a section of BCCI members believe Yadav can sign the report, some members feel in the presence of an elected president, Yadav's signature may create a legal loophole that can be exploited by an aggrieved member later on. There is a possibility that the ruling faction within the BCCI may well prefer to postpone the AGM citing incomplete annual accounts.

The annual report is also far from being ready, according to another high-ranking BCCI official. The annual accounts have to be finalised by the finance committee and forwarded to the working committee for its approval. However, the BCCI's working committee hasn't been convened since April 20, four days after the Court confirmed that Srinivasan couldn't return to the BCCI till the end of the IPL investigation.

Multiple former office-bearers confirmed that a working committee meeting can still be held during the three-week window between circulation of the AGM notice and the AGM. And this might be feasible for the Srinivasan camp, considering opposition, if any, has so far been muted.

Some of Srinivasan's key opponents, including Lalit Modi (Rajasthan Cricket Association), Jyotiraditya Scindia (Madhya Pradesh Cricket Association), Niranjan Shah (Saurashtra Cricket Association), Ajay Shirke (Maharashtra Cricket Association) and even Sharad Pawar (Mumbai Cricket Association) have remained silent. One of the opposition members said "the status quo" would continue when asked if there was any plan to stall Srinivasan and his supporters from trying to postpone the AGM.


Read More..

England abuse hints at deep malaise

A portion of the British Asian population that not only does not cheer for the English team, but rejoices in abusing and ridiculing those from their own background who succeed. That is alarming

After Moeen Ali gently chided those booing him and put the loyalties of British born Indians under scrutiny - and with similar disappointments perhaps set to arise with British born Pakistanis when Pakistan next tour - it is time again to consider the deeper issues of identity and integration in modern, multicultural Britain and how they arise in the arena of cricket.

Alongside Enoch Powell's Rivers Of Blood speech, Norman Tebbit's infamous "cricket test" is perhaps the most memorable political utterance about race relations in Britain.

Controversially proposed by the former Conservative cabinet minister nearly 25 years ago as a measure for levels of immigrant assimilation, it was seen by its creator to uncover the true identity of migrant populations through the medium of cricket.

Targeting the large South Asian and West Indian population who had settled in Britain during the 50s and 60s, whilst emphasising the conduct of the former, Tebbit remarked: "Which side do they cheer for? It's an interesting test. Are you still harking back to where you came from or where you are?"

The manner of his comments, which taken in context seemed to hit out at a perceived disloyalty common among the British Asian community, was widely criticised by his opponents, some of whom went so far as to claim he ought to be prosecuted for inciting religious hatred.

Despite this, the founder of what became known as The Tebbit Test stood by his comments, reigniting the controversy in the aftermath of the 7/7 bombings in London by claiming a starker appraisal of assimilation in Britain based on his method could have prevented the terrorist attack on the capital.

Such expansive claims aside, the debate around the test remains salient particularly in the contexts of the India tour of England. That India receive significant and vocal backing when playing in England is undeniable. And it is clear, having been to games, that the swathes of Indian fans are not comprised entirely by devoted fans from India, or even just first generation migrants, but instead individuals who have been born and raised here in Britain.

To the bemusement of those who sympathise with Tebbit, the recent fracas between Jimmy Anderson and Ravi Jadeja saw the counterattacking batting of Jadeja (who was admittedly booed by the crowd on the way to the wicket) at Lord's be greeted with raucous chants in his favour.

This was not the first time that a Lord's crowd lived up to Tebbit's prescriptions by any means. England's hosting of the ICC T20 World Cup in 2009 saw their side booed heavily by Indian fans before their team were eliminated by the hosts.

Such a reaction at their traditional home (and indeed the home of cricket in general) caused a stir in the England ranks, with captain at the time Paul Collingwood claiming the hostile reaction was "strange" and "hurt a few people" but ultimately acted as a motivational boost for his side.

And as a young, second-generation British Indian, who was once a keen cricketer and remains a massive fan of the sport, it is this second case that I feel hits upon a more bizarre and concerning trend: a trend that Tebbit's test in fact misses. There seems to be a portion of the British Asian population that not only does not cheer for the English team, but rejoices in abusing and ridiculing them. Some is for comic effect, for sure, but only some.

This trend becomes all the more alarming when you consider some of the players in the firing line.

Nasser Hussain, a Chennai-born former England captain was commonly a pantomime villain for supporters of India, and has come out in the past to express his confusion as to why second and third generation fans do not get behind his team.

Hussain's confusion is perhaps easier to understand when you consider some other prominent names to represent the England team in my time: Mark Ramprakash, Vikram Solanki, Owais Shah, Monty Panesar, Sajid Mahmood, Samit Patel, Ravi Bopara - and now Moeen Ali.

Plenty of young British Asians have taken the chance to represent England, and have done so with distinction.

However consider the penultimate name on that list. Bopara, whose family originates from the Sikh province of Punjab in India, comes across as the most quintessential of young Asian Brits.

A London boy, whose cricket developed in line with the twin inspirations of the Indian legend Sachin Tendulkar and the aforementioned Hussain, Bopara, away from the pitch, owns two popular chicken takeaway shops in the capital.

Yet, though he is so similar to many of the young British Asians who love cricket, Bopara has come in line for protracted abuse from some Indian fans. He is branded a "gaddar" or traitor (which is sometimes chanted at him by partisan crowds), howled at when batting, and consistently criticised and mocked by a portion of the Indian support. Why? Simply because he plays for England.

It is this aspect of local support for India which seems most paradoxical in nature. Rather than celebrating the achievements of a talent from their own community, making it big on the international stage, a portion of fans choose instead to denigrate him, though they in fact have much more in common with him than their Indian heroes. Could it be that such fans are suffering from a form of identity crisis?

Drawing generalisations is of course always a dangerous game. The continued support of the Indian team from embedded migrant populations need not entail a rejection of their identifying strongly as British for example. In fact, recent statistics seem to suggest that the Asian community in Britain do identify as such.

Support of the Indian cricket team might then simply be a way of connecting with one's culture, sharing something with parents and grandparents, or celebrating one's roots in a positive and joyous manner.

Tebbit's test makes the mistake of construing identity in too rigid and simplistic a way. Each of us has numerous identities, drawn up on differing lines. To claim that the support of a team in one sporting arena gives us a definitive insight into the psyche of those descending from migrants in Britain seems rather hasty.

However, there remains a salience to his warning. Whilst the continued support of some British Asians for the Indian team is perfectly capable of being a positive thing, the continuing sense of hostility towards the English team and, most worryingly, towards some of the British Asians who represent them is harder to explain away.

The issue at hand is no longer "which side do they cheer for?", but instead "who do they abuse?", and when it is seen by some to be the action of a "gaddar" to represent England it would seem that cricket might still have something interesting and ultimately concerning to tell us about identity in modern Britain.

If those supporting India do genuinely feel hostility towards England, and to British Asians representing their country of birth then it does not seem sensationalist to claim this points towards a crisis of identity, and a trend that is damaging to the project of meaningful multiculturalism.

Of course there remains a further explanation for some. Could it be the case that continued impassioned support for the Indian team, often accompanied by stick for England, is in fact a reaction to perceived prejudice?

As a young Asian Brit I have never felt such an impulse. However, if it is the case that young, integrated British Asians have full intention in their childhood to support England, but spring back to the team of their roots due to perceived discrimination or racism this must be taken seriously.

If it is racism that turns these fans away from joining the Barmy Army and instead towards the Bharat Army it must be tackled strongly. But with young Asian Brits like Moeen Ali coming through the system - one of an increasing number - and taking such pride in representing the team of his birth, a disconnect of this kind appears hard to explain.

If Moeen has felt that prejudice, he has conquered it. Why fans with much in common with him would feel so differently remains a conundrum.

We need to understand why it is these individuals feel this way, debate it and then seek a remedy. However whether this is genuinely felt, or a case of football hooliganism invading cricket and manifesting in an unrepresentative minority is hard to tell.

But don't write off the power of cricket to instigate an important and meaningful debate about immigration and identity. Even if Norman Tebbit's cricket test has not been remembered favourably throughout history, we're still talking about it.

Most crucially we are still feeling the need to reflect on the issues it sought to address. Issues which regardless of our view on the matter, should not be deemed too controversial to think about in modern, multicultural Britain, for it is in understanding them in their fullest that we can preserve that Britain most effectively.

Kishan Koria is an aspiring journalist from Canterbury and a graduate from the University of Oxford, where he studied Philosophy, Politics and Economics. This is an adapted version of a piece that first appeared in International Political Forum, the home of politically engaged young people around the world.


Read More..

Warwickshire return to Lord's, but English cricket should worry

Warwickshire 219 for 4 (Trott 58, Ambrose 51*, Chopra 50) beat Kent 215 for 8 (Billings 40*, Rankin 3-34) by six wickets
Scorecard

Dobell: A reminder of Trott and Rankin's talent

The contrasting expressions on the faces of the players told the story: whatever the gentle decline in popularity of county cricket over the last couple of decades, the prospect of a Lord's final still means a great deal. Warwickshire, winners of the NatWest T20 Blast not two weeks ago, go to the home of cricket with a chance of achieving a notable double.

So what a shame this game was witnessed by so few. Despite Warwickshire's best efforts - tickets cost a maximum of £10 and members of both clubs and U16s were let in free - there were fewer than 3,000 spectators inside the ground.

Compare that with a similar match from the not so distance past. In 1994, these sides met on the same ground in the semi-final of the NatWest Trophy. On that occasion a crowd of around 14,000 created a memorable atmosphere. Somewhere along the way, the game has stopped engaging with the mass market.

This was a match that might be used as a microcosm of much that is wrong in English cricket. On a decent but worn pitch - again, that is not fault of the groundsmen, there are simply no fresh surfaces available at this stage of the season - that will bear no comparison to the surfaces anticipated at the World Cup in Australasia, on a weekday during the school term and in between two high-profile international games on the same ground within the week, there is simply not the time or the appetite for spectators to attend. The schedule is bloated and broken.

It is increasingly hard to avoid the conclusion that, almost a decade after the game all but disappeared from free-to-air television, a decade after central contracts and the increased international schedule snatched the best players from the domestic circuit, cricket is dying in England. Or at least slipping into gentle irrelevance. Like Morris dancing and origami.

Such is the gradual drop in spectator numbers, that this may go unnoticed. But we are fools if we ignore the empty seats at Durham when the Ashes were won, the empty seats in Southampton during the India Test, the drop in average gate numbers for the re-launched NatWest Blast, the reliance on foreign-raised or privately educated players in teams up and down the land and the decline in space offered to the game by newspapers. No amount of hubris can replace the oxygen of publicity. Eden is burning and if the management of the ECB are unwilling to acknowledge and confront the issue, they will have failed in their duty as custodians of the game.

And yet, as this game demonstrated, there is still quality to enjoy. Despite the absence of three first choice bowlers - Chris Woakes, Chris Wright and Keith Barker - Warwickshire demonstrated skill and variety with the ball and athleticism and commitment in the field. While this was not the high-scoring encounter that might have been desired of a show-piece domestic fixture, there was still entertainment to be derived from Warwickshire's masterclass in limited-overs bowling on a pitch a little better than the low scores might suggest.

Boyd Rankin, bowling with the pace and hostility that must have Ireland supporters banging their heads in frustration, claimed three wickets - including both openers due to extra bounce - and struck Alex Blake on the helmet in an impressively sustained spell of fast bowling that earned the Man-of-the-Match award.

Jeetan Patel and Rikki Clarke demonstrated the skill and control that has played such a huge part in their side's progress and Recordo Gordon and Oliver Hannon-Dalby bowled with a maturity that belied their relative inexperience. With Kent restricted to a score perhaps 30 below par, the game was all but over as a contest long before Warwickshire began their reply.

Certainly Varun Chopra and Jonathan Trott were made for run-chases such as this. The pair batted with composure in adding 110 for Warwickshire's second wicket, with Trott compiling 50 from 49 balls with those characteristic clips through midwicket and a series of reverse-sweeps that once won many games for England. By rotating the strike with calm skill on the same pitch on which England were suffocated by India on Tuesday, he provided a reminder of what England had been missing in recent months.

While both men will be disappointed that they failed to see their side home, Tim Ambrose, an often under-rated talent, made sure of the victory with a typically busy half-century.

Perhaps, had Sam Billings - averaging more than 100 in the competition this season - batted higher than No. 8, Kent may have given themselves a batter chance. As it was, by the time he reached the crease in the 38th over, the damage was too deep to be repaired.

And perhaps, had Daniel Bell-Drummond, who scored three half-centuries in six games in the qualifying rounds, been selected ahead of Rob Key or Fabian Cowdrey, they may have a little more firepower.

As it was, Kent struggled to adjust to the surface and, in attempting to post 260, failed to reach the 240 that may have proved adequate. Until Billings thrashed 23 from his final nine deliveries and helped Kent ad 26 from their final two overs, no batsman passed 34 and provided the foundation on which his colleagues might have built.

With Ian Bell and Woakes expected to be fit and available, Warwickshire will present tough opposition in the final. Twenty years after the club completed a remarkable treble of trophies, the class of 2014 are proving worthy successors.


Read More..

IPL should not exist - Botham

Ian Botham used the platform of his MCC Spirit of Cricket Cowdrey Lecture to brand the IPL "too powerful" for the good of cricket and said he believed it should not exist.

He said that the tournament provided the "perfect opportunity for betting and therefore fixing" and on the subject of corruption also called on the ICC to do more to expose the "big names" involved.

"I'm worried about the IPL - in fact, I feel it shouldn't be there at all as it is changing the priorities of world cricket," Botham said. "Players are slaves to it. Administrators bow to it.

"How on earth did the IPL own the best players in the world for two months a year and not pay a penny to the boards who brought these players into the game?

"I know this has been modified to a degree, but it is still an imbalance. The IPL is too powerful for the long-term good of the game.

"Corruption is enough of a problem in itself, but the IPL compounds that problem given it provides the perfect opportunity for betting and therefore fixing."

Expanding on the corruption theme, he added: "We have seen a few players exposed, but does throwing the odd second XI player into jail solve it? To kill the serpent, you must cut off its head. The ICC Anti-Corruption Unit must pursue the root of the problem and if necessary expose the big names."

Closer to home, Botham questioned whether the presence of central contracts had made England's players too "cosy" and also called on the UK government to do more cricket in schools.

"Central contracts are brilliant, but it has now become so essential to the England player that the sharpness goes," he said. "A long contract is a cosy contract. To play international sport, above all else - above even freshness and rest - you must have desire. Hunger is still the most important attribute for any sportsman."

On the facilities and time given to sport, especially cricket, in schools Botham said it drove him "insane" how little is being done and called on the Prime Minister David Cameron to live up to his promise of making change happen.

"Why aren't the Government focusing on sport as a necessity in the school curriculum?" he said. "This subject drives me insane. I feel it is my duty to point out the problems that face sport in schools, and specifically cricket.

"The problem is now that schools are too big and there is no personal touch with the teachers. And as schools get bigger, one of the things you lose are your playing fields," he added. "Come on David Cameron - when I came to Downing Street to meet you, you made all the right noises and promised to come back to me with your ideas. I'm still waiting."


Read More..

McMillan named New Zealand batting coach

Former Test batsman Craig McMillan has joined New Zealand as their full-time batting coach for the next two years. McMillan filled the role temporarily during their recent tour of the West Indies after Bob Carter's departure earlier this year and has just returned home from a successful New Zealand A tour of England.

He will now be part of the permanent setup, joining head coach Mike Hesson, who on Wednesday had his contract extended until 2017, and bowling coach Shane Bond. New Zealand Cricket's head of cricket Lindsay Crocker said McMillan had established a good rapport with the players over the past few months.

"The West Indies and NZA tours were his first as a coach at that level, and we're very happy with his development," Crocker said. "He's been awarded his two-year contract on that basis and I'm confident he'll continue to form an excellent coaching trio with Mike and Shane."

McMillan played 55 Tests for New Zealand from 1997 to 2005, scored six centuries and averaged 38.46. In 197 one-day internationals he scored three hundreds and averaged 28.18. He retired from first-class cricket in 2007.


Read More..

Mathews named SLC Cricketer of the Year

An outstanding year as a Test batsman, ODI allrounder and captain saw Angelo Mathews reap the Cricketer of the Year prize at the Sri Lanka Cricket awards. Mathews also won the Best ODI Batsman and ODI Allrounder awards, and got a joint nod for the Test Batsman prize alongside Kumar Sangakkara.

Rangana Herath was the Best Test Bowler for the third year running, for his 60 wickets from 10 matches in the qualifying period. Lasith Malinga took home the ODI and T20 bowling prizes, having also captained Sri Lanka to a World T20 victory, while Thisara Perera and Kusal Perera won awards for T20 Allrounder and Batsman respectively.

Wicketkeeper-batsman Niroshan Dickwella was SLC's Emerging Player of the Year, thanks to a bright start in Tests. He has pouched 12 catches and made two stumpings in his three matches so far, as well as hitting an aggressive 72 against South Africa on debut. He also won the domestic limited-overs batting award.

Mathews has been exceptional down the order in all formats for Sri Lanka, hitting defining innings in each of the series and tournaments that Sri Lanka have won in the past six months. He hit 1292 Test runs at an average of 92.28 in the past 12 months and 965 ODI runs at 53.61.

His 160 in the second Test at Headingley transformed the outlook of that match, but he had also struck a 23-ball 40 to help see Sri Lanka to the World T20 final, as well as averaging 196 in their victorious Asia Cup campaign. He has also contributed steadily with the ball, largely in the limited-overs formats.

Mathews could not shake Sangakkara's five-year grip on the People's Choice Award, which was voted on online and via text message. The joint win for Test batting was also the fourth straight year Sangakkara had won that award. In the past year he had hit 1502 runs at 75.10, which included a career-best 319.

Former Sri Lanka captain Shashikala Siriwardene was the major winner in the women's categories, claiming the bowling and allrounder awards, while Chamari Atapattu took the award for batting, in what has been a quieter year for the team.

Jehan Mubarak won the Best Batsman Award in first-class cricket for an exceptional season in which he hit 1165 runs at 105.90, and had been the primary contributor to Nondescripts Cricket Club's tournament win. Colts Cricket Club's left-arm wrist-spinner Lakshan Rangika was the Best Bowler, having taken 54 wickets in the competition, while Jeevan Mendis was Best Allrounder. Ragama Cricket Club's left-arm seamer Nilanka Premaratne and Tamil Union allrounder Sachith Pathirana also won prizes for List A cricket.


Read More..

SA collapse to give England series

England Women 141 for 3 (Edwards 75*) beat South Africa Women 99 (van Niekerk 34, Gunn 3-13) by 42 runs
Scorecard

For two-thirds of this match South Africa produced a better account of themselves at Wantage Road than they had done in the opening game, but England were ultimately too strong as they secured the series on the back of another captain's innings from Charlotte Edwards and three wickets from Jenny Gunn when the visitors had set themselves up in the chase.

After opting to tackle the match from the opposite way round - batting, rather than bowling, first - Edwards' unbeaten 75 off 61 balls led England to a solid 141 for 3 but while there were 20 fours in total, 11 of them coming from Edwards, the sixes tally stood at zero and having been 98 for 2 after 15 overs the home side could have expected greater acceleration.

South Africa made a lively start to their reply and were marginally ahead on the comparisons after the Powerplay - 46 for 1 against England's 44 without loss - but from 71 for 2 in the 13th over they lost 8 for 28 to mean they again fell short of three figures.

Katherine Brunt had started the innings with a no-ball and the subsequent free hit was top-edged for four by Dane van Niekerk who, having earlier bowled her legspin neatly, collect five boundaries in the Powerplay.

England knew they were in a contest this time and were relieved when Mignon du Preez picked out deep midwicket off Danielle Hazell and it was the spinners who regained control. The first three overs after the fielding restrictions went for just nine and Hazell completed her four overs for 17 as the asking rate started to head towards 10 an over.

Having reached 25 at a run-a-ball, van Niekerk made nine her next 21 deliveries before she was superbly caught in the deep by Brunt. That gave Gunn her first wicket and in her next over she tripled that tally in the space of two deliveries to end the chances of a late push for the line by South Africa.

There were some cheap wickets at the end as South Africa swished and missed, providing the chance for Sarah Taylor to put on fine exhibition of glovework especially with the stumpings off Anya Shrubsole and Brunt.

The foundation for England's innings was laid by an opening stand of 45 between Edwards and Lauren Winfield, both players producing crisp straight drives, before Winfield was stumped having dragged her back foot out of the crease trying to sweep.

Taylor chipped to mid-off for another unfulfilled innings but Edwards' fifty arrived a short while later from 45 balls, her four consecutive international half-century. Back-to-back boundaries at the end of 16th over appeared to signal a final surge from England but it did not quite emerge that way as South Africa held their nerve, keeping the last four overs to 32 runs. Ultimately, though, they did not have the depth of batting or calmness to force an upset.


Read More..

Six USA players may withdraw from Uganda tour

USA players put pressure on USACA and ICC over security concerns for tour to Uganda

Three USA players have said they are definitely withdrawing their availability for USA's scheduled tour to Uganda in October over safety and security concerns, while three others have said they are considering pulling out depending on how the situation continues to unfold. All three players who are committed to withdrawing played for USA in 2013 and can be termed as first-choice players for the national team, while two of the three who are considering withdrawing are also key players who could expect to be picked for the tour.

The development comes ahead of a USA Cricket Association (USACA) board meeting this week to decide whether USACA will approve of sending a squad to participate in the six-team ICC WCL Division Three from October 26 to November 2. The event is part of the 2019 World Cup qualifying structure and the top two teams will be promoted to WCL Division Two in January.

ESPNcricinfo has communicated with 16 players about the Uganda tour, all of whom have played for the USA. Seven of the 16 rated safety and security as a major concern for touring Uganda while four stated they had received pressure from family members not to go on the tour. The majority of players felt the ICC would provide adequate security for the team if the tour went ahead, but four players felt that USA's squad would not be provided with any additional security compared to the other teams, while two felt there would not be enough security to convince them to go.

"2010, that's the safest tour I've been on and I felt safe on that tour," one player told ESPNcricinfo. The player was referencing enhanced security for the team ahead of their first-ever match against Afghanistan on the 2010 tour to the UAE for the World T20 Qualifier. Those security arrangements were specially made by then USACA chief executive Don Lockerbie.

"For every two players we had one security guard. If five or six of us went out, we had at least three security guards so we could go anywhere we wanted and would feel okay and not have to worry about anything but not on the other tour." The player said that on a subsequent tour to Dubai for another World T20 Qualifier, USA had far less security to the point where he did not feel comfortable leaving the team hotel on his own. As such, he did not feel confident about any guarantees made by tournament organisers regarding security for the team in Uganda.

The player was less concerned about general safety in the country and is more worried about Ebola virus as well as USA's players being the target of a terrorist or kidnapping plot. In particular, the player mentioned the recent murder of an American journalist carried out by ISIS militants in the Middle East as something that factored into his decision to not travel to certain countries while representing a national team.

"I listen to a lot of talk radio and politics. You're going over there to represent America. Yes it probably won't happen but I personally think about the worst situation. Anything could happen so it's better to be safe than sorry. You will be wearing the uniform. The flag will be there. Word starts going around. It's kind of sad that James Foley probably had nothing to do with this whole stuff. He was just a regular journalist and he got caught up in it. That's probably the same mindset that he had, 'What would they want with me? All of the politics that are happening here, I don't have anything to do with it,' but he actually got dragged into it.

"Anything to do with America, there are so many people that really don't like us so you just have to be really careful. Once you have anything to do with America, then more than likely you will be a target. I don't look at it as whatever they have happening in the Middle East is the only branch. I think copycats and someone who has the same beliefs that they do will try to capitalise on whatever is going on."

Another player said he had been in regular contact with several players from Nepal on the issue, including one player who could be described as a key first-choice player, and that they held concerns mainly over Ebola virus but also some security concerns. Two other USA players said they would make themselves available for selection if the tournament is moved to Singapore, Malaysia, Nepal or the USA. One of those two will not play otherwise while the other is undecided on whether he will accept a squad invite if the tournament is not moved from Uganda.

Most players are in favour of a USA team going on tour whether or not they themselves wind up traveling. Only two players said that anyone from USACA had reached out to them to get their opinions on the issue while many players said they had not had any communication with USACA since USA's last tournament in November 2013. Of the two who want the tournament moved, one said the lack of a professional contract and support structure for USA was a consideration to not go to Uganda. Taking time off from work and risking personal safety for little to no pay was not worth the trip and that if a first-choice team can't go, then USACA should consider calling off the tour.

"Everybody wants to play for the USA. You would like to have your best team participating in the tournament and you'd like to win," the player said. "If certain players want to go anyway and the USA qualifies, I'd be happy, but I won't go. If USA can't select the best 14, no I don't think they should go because at the end of the day, it's a product. If you send a product out there and the product is no good, then it's going to reflect badly on you. To leave my job and go over there for how long and they won't pay me, as much as I want to represent the USA, it doesn't make sense. It's not worth it, not at all."

Uganda Cricket Association chief executive Justine Ligyalingi has sought to downplay any fears over safety and security at the tournament. Uganda has successfully hosted multiple recent ICC Africa regional tournaments, including both the ICC Africa Division One Twenty20 and the ICC Africa U-19 World Cup Qualifier in 2013. Ligyalingi is eager to showcase Uganda's cricket facilities and demonstrate that Uganda can host an equally safe and successful global tournament.

"The Association has been working closely with the government of Uganda and the ICC regarding safety and security arrangements for the forthcoming tournament," Ligyalingi wrote in an email to ESPNcricinfo. "Obviously it's been a matter of priority and a lot of discussions and preparations have gone into this area. The USA embassy in Kampala has also been involved in this. We're confident that the arrangements being put in place will provide a safe and secure environment, guarantee safety and security for all the participants and we will have an enjoyable tournament."

The ICC has previously said in emails sent in August to the six participating countries that "there are currently no major concerns identified or any specific threats to the tournament, teams, match officials, match venues or hotels." ESPNcricinfo contacted the ICC in August to ask if there was any contingency plan in place should USA or any other country withdraw from the event, but a spokesperson declined to comment.


Read More..

Helpless Rajasthan's players 'in a dilemma'

The continuing impasse between the BCCI and the Rajasthan Cricket Association (RCA) has left the players confused and distressed. The players feel both sides, which are charged with protecting their interests, have let them down. They feel they are caught between the vague offers of the BCCI and the silence of RCA president Lalit Modi.

"The RCA is trying to challenge the BCCI ban. But neither the RCA nor the BCCI are coming up with any options for the players," a senior Rajasthan player told ESPNcricinfo. He said in the current situation players should be told they will get some sort of help, and in case things are not sorted out the players should still be shown some direction rather than being forced to sit at home. He pointed out that most of the year players "are waiting" to play the domestic season and then, suddenly, they are now faced a situation where "we can't do anything".

On Sunday players got a call from the RCA, asking them to report to the preparatory camp starting at the academy grounds inside the Sawai Mansingh Stadium in Jaipur from Tuesday. That was not really news to the players since, during the pre-season fitness camp in July, they had been told training sessions would commence on August 20. But it was the timing of the call that surprised the players, and confused them too, seeing as just last week the BCCI had omitted Rajasthan from Ranji Trophy, women's tournaments and all age-group cricket - Under-16, Under-19, Under-23. Following that, the RCA did not feature in the central zone meeting organised to finalise venues for zonal age-group tournaments.

Mehmood Abdi, a senior member of the RCA executive board, called the BCCI move a PR exercise. According to him the RCA was sticking to its activity calendar. Accordingly, the camp for the senior team started today and will go on till September 8. The Challenger Trophy for Under-19s will be held between September 4 and 6 in Jaipur, from which the ODI colts team will be picked.

Despite Abdi's words, the sidelining of the RCA has not been lost on the players, who questioned the usefulness of the camp. The senior player, who was spending time with his family, said he and his team-mates had no other alternative but to attend the camp. "What else can we do?" he pointed out, adding if he did not it could harm his chances.

Through all this Modi, expelled by the BCCI but elected as RCA president in May, has made himself scarce. The Rajasthan players want Modi to address them directly. According to the senior player, there has been no proper communication till date "explaining the situation to us". He felt "the simplest thing" that can be done is to speak to the players.

Even the assurances of BCCI secretary Sanjay Patel, who had said that if a Rajasthan player wanted to turn professional (meaning, sign up with another domestic team) he would keep that option open to them till the very last minute before the season starts in October, has not offered much comfort. According to a few Rajasthan players it was not such a straightforward decision to turn professional and turn up for another state.

For some, shifting teams is not the preferred option; one of the players pointed out that he could have turned professional a few years ago but representing Rajasthan remained his priority. The player said: "Nothing is clear about till when the ban on RCA will last. In such a scenario, to decide whether to play as professional is not so easy. To run away is not the answer."

Another reason the players do not want to risk moving out is, "what if by next month the problem is sorted out"? There is no clear-cut answer. The players say they are "in a dilemma". They "definitely" want to play Rajasthan, that remains their "first" preference. But more than anything "we want to play cricket", a player explained.

After Modi assumed the RCA presidency, he immediately declared no amount of coercion from the BCCI would defeat him. He assured the elected members as well as players that the issues that developed under his predecessor, CP Joshi, would be turned around.

While addressing the executive committee in the last week of August, Modi, speaking from London via video conferencing, assured the various district units and the RCA administration that he would handle the situation and asked them to stay put. Exactly what - if any sort - of truce he is willing to sign or concessions he is open to, no one was aware of. But his combative attitude has only added to the confusion.

Despite having suspended the RCA the BCCI had said that it would not neglect the players and would keep the slot for Rajasthan open in case the Brijesh Patel-led committee could resolve the deadlock between BCCI, RCA and the Rajasthan government.

In early August three members of the ad-hoc committee, appointed by the BCCI to oversee disputed states, met Rajeev Maharshi (chief secretary) and JC Mohanty (principal secretary, sports) of the Rajasthan government, to seek some clarifications and assurances as well as highlight the issues between the BCCI and the RCA. It is understood that the committee explained the BCCI's plan to remedy the situation to the government officials.

Modi had utilised the Rajasthan Sports Act, which governs the constitution of the RCA, to come back to power in spite of his BCCI ban. Hence the committee was obliged to keep the state government in the loop. Even if the BCCI believes the issue is between the board and the RCA, it wanted to make sure it would not be faced with any future legal implications if it were to go ahead and select players for various teams itself, under the Rajasthan banner.

Apparently, the Rajasthan Sports Act prohibits the use of word Rajasthan without permission. It also states that the only a body affiliated and registered with the registrar can manage and govern the game, which in this case is RCA.

Despite that meeting, though, things have not moved forward on the legal front for the BCCI. "Currently things are just languishing. The sub-committee has not got any directions from the board's legal cell yet," a BCCI official said.

The official said he was confident about the players' future being secure. "I am sure the teams will play ultimately. Whatever happens, the players will not lose out. I can understand their anxiety, that the season is approaching and there is lack of clarity. But in the end I do not think there is no Rajasthan. Because it is bad for everyone: BCCI, RCA, Rajasthan government, for everybody involved. Nobody wants that to happen."

These may well remain empty words to the players, though, till both the BCCI and the RCA personally speak to them.


Read More..